Attribution Pictures

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Kirils

But the old canvas.

And in the new photos.

[Kirils]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And on the new photos.

Here's proof.
Maybe with far it seems to you that it is new, and the new is not as it looks.

[camertus]

gives the impression of highly diffuse.
why not read the signature.
great masterpiece not think so.
an interesting story.

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от camertus

gives the impression of highly diffuse.
so the signature can not be read.

It is not blurred, but was in a "good" boss who is constantly wiping it with a damp cloth from such care and turned worn and unreadable signature.

[camertus]

I think of a damp cloth, oil will not get away.
however, I want to try, has not yet decided which of their belongings

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от camertus

I think of a damp cloth, the oil will not get away.

Come down, if it is done repeatedly and for many years.

[Михалыч]

And I think that over the signature of "job."
"E" might have made of "B", and the name is also "trim" under Russian.
Weird pale green around the crimson letters podnalozhena.

[camertus]

Russian definitely work - you can see the landscape, in village huts, at a roadside chapel

[Михалыч]

Сообщение от camertus

work is definitely Russian - you can see the landscape, in village huts, at a roadside chapel

I'm sorry, but that "it is evident" in the image, does not prove Russian authorship.
Foreigners represent Russian folklore from the 18th century.