What should be a museum?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Just Russian twentieth century - the second volume.

And what about the West.
Europe in the Saratov Museum of you talking about?

Even seen in the eye.

And it is (with)


There she was (WE) is much that is
as usual.

[SAH]

Сообщение от iside

PR machine should be powerful, you just need to look for sponsors to give a money-sponsors have to offer something interesting and unprecedented, etc.

Have any idea what that offer fun-unseen?
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ -> Seriously ...
very interesting.

[I-V]

Very good theme

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor; 2063571"

museum should be large and nemnogolyudnom.
The best museums that I visited with pleasure - a Berlin gallery of old art, Museum of Fine Arts in Antwerp, New Tretyakov Gallery.

Thank God things are exhibited in the New Tretyakov Gallery, still do not care about the masses - hence nemnogolyudnom. In a word, well, that Petrov-Vodkin and Filonov, for example, was separated from Shishkin with Repin - otherwise we would nesdobrovat. I agree with you there nice to roam - sometimes hear a pin drop - well ...

But again - I would like more. Of course, the bad, that in the Tretyakov Gallery and Modern Art show, but how many places are occupied by the present authors' works! You look at some rumbling in the desert zalischah video installation and involuntarily estimate - how many dozens of paintings (not to mention the chart) from the store could enter here! But they probably did not happen to see ...

In short, yes - GUM should be given to a ISO. There is a wonderful natural light pours through the glass ceiling and all the space is impressive. And how many cubbyhole where they could accommodate cozy exposure? Again, the graphics would be nice - less light in the corners. Although in recent years with the daylight began to fight at all. Musee d'Orsay, in my opinion, just ruined by expelling him from the light of day. Had the museum in the GUM, and it can also be bricked - in vain, that the dome over their heads stretched out to tens of meters - all in darkness, the darkness ... Say, oil paintings from the light, too spoiled. Is this true? In my opinion, it is possible to argue.

What about the rangers in this area? It is unclear ... The glass wall? Perhaps this is a way out. The main thing is to clear (nepachkayuschayasya kind?), Anti-glare and fairly close to the pictures. Not too pleased, of course, but all the way out. Security is not the last thing - would be such a wall in the Hermitage - Danae would have remained intact.

What should be a museum? Ideally, a museum, of course, to be conservative. That is, any hasty changes (especially without the ongoing public debate in the community) to be in no case be exercised. With the Pushkin Museum, for example, just did a terrible thing, when removed from the second floor the entire 19th and 20th centuries. in the adjacent building. From beneath the high ceilings, beautiful Tsvetaeva in some multi-storey back room. I, of course, and there get used to walking around and even fell in love with it, but still - this is just a defensive reaction, so to say Stockholm Syndrome. And in general - it's terrible. Everything was lost, never to "find".

But today? Today was in the main building and what happens? Farewell, the Egyptian hall and the East. All - adieu! Instead of beautiful cross, spacious windows, instead of a deep greenish hue of the walls and curtains (it's Egip.zale) - a boutique "Boucheron"! All blue, all gathered in groups and are against the wall, highlighted, though, in the time the cabin, the windows zaukuporeny and most importantly - has disappeared from his childhood favorite mummy's head with protruding teeth! We will not see it with you, as their ears now. Remember, ladies and gentlemen.

I had a suspicion that in these halls all the spoil, when their sly closed some time ago - and failed. But now is not dusty and everything shines! As if in a museum can not be dusty? It's sad.

Another sweet deal in the Pushkin Museum - Hall of Michelangelo. Everything is shifted away, Moses hauled from place to place, sticking upright body (not the most beautiful), dozens of chairs around. Here, then, there are concerts. Of course, this is fine, but what's the Michelangelo? For that he furnish the plastic chairs and suppress organ chrome pipes? Such is the smallest stadium turned out, not Hall of the Italian genius. Maybe there is also a cafe open? And the name, for example, the "Pieta"? So what? Sounds!

Well, that Flemish painting in the hall of the place, "Satire is a guest of the farmer," Jordaens hung for some reason the Dutch landscape Konninka I generally keep quiet. How can you not see that the dark red walls look cool Konninka not lie - an enigma.

That's what was done to Eg. Hall:

Text apologetic:
http://museum-ru.livejournal.com/42091.html

Photo:
http://victorsolkin.livejournal.com/454788.html


As it was (see thumbnail)

[iside]

Сообщение от SAH

Is it any ideas that offer a fun-unseen?
Seriously ...
very interesting.

Yes, of course, seriously.
There are many ideas, a more interesting on the other.
But the idea of ​​not free ....
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

Yes, of course, seriously.
There are many ideas, a more interesting on the other.
But the idea of ​​not free ....
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Isis, the price in the studio <! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[SAH]

Сообщение от iside

But the idea of ​​not free ....

Mercantile .... but you
<! - ~ 7 ~ -> I was rubbing his hands, I thought I would enjoy your book interesting ideas, but it was not there ...
<! - 7 ~ ~ -> <! - ~ 5 ~ ->

[iside]

In New York, from 27 to 29 June at the Metropolitan Museum will be an interesting conference Communicating the Museum in 2012 Subject: The world is changing: How to adapt to a museum?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от IV

Very good theme

Читать дальше... 

Thank God things are exhibited in the New Tretyakov Gallery, still do not care about the masses - hence nemnogolyudnom. In a word, well, that Petrov-Vodkin and Filonov, for example, was separated from Shishkin with Repin - otherwise we would nesdobrovat. I agree with you there nice to roam - sometimes hear a pin drop - well ...

But again - I would like more. Of course, the bad, that in the Tretyakov Gallery and Modern Art show, but how many places are occupied by the present authors' works! You look at some rumbling in the desert zalischah video installation and involuntarily estimate - how many dozens of paintings (not to mention the chart) from the store could enter here! But they probably did not happen to see ...

In short, yes - GUM should be given to a ISO. There is a wonderful natural light pours through the glass ceiling and all the space is impressive. And how many cubbyhole where they could accommodate cozy exposure? Again, the graphics would be nice - less light in the corners. Although in recent years with the daylight began to fight at all. Musee d'Orsay, in my opinion, just ruined by expelling him from the light of day. Had the museum in the GUM, and it can also be bricked - in vain, that the dome over their heads stretched out to tens of meters - all in darkness, the darkness ... Say, oil paintings from the light, too spoiled. Is this true? In my opinion, it is possible to argue.

What about the rangers in this area? It is unclear ... The glass wall? Perhaps this is a way out. The main thing is to clear (nepachkayuschayasya kind?), Anti-glare and fairly close to the pictures. Not too pleased, of course, but all the way out. Security is not the last thing - would be such a wall in the Hermitage - Danae would have remained intact.

What should be a museum? Ideally, a museum, of course, to be conservative. That is, any hasty changes (especially without the ongoing public debate in the community) to be in no case be exercised. With the Pushkin Museum, for example, just did a terrible thing, when removed from the second floor the entire 19th and 20th centuries. in the adjacent building. From beneath the high ceilings, beautiful Tsvetaeva in some multi-storey back room. I, of course, and there get used to walking around and even fell in love with it, but still - this is just a defensive reaction, so to say Stockholm Syndrome. And in general - it's terrible. Everything was lost, never to "find".

But today? Today was in the main building and what happens? Farewell, the Egyptian hall and the East. All - adieu! Instead of beautiful cross, spacious windows, instead of a deep greenish hue of the walls and curtains (it's Egip.zale) - a boutique "Boucheron"! All blue, all gathered in groups and are against the wall, highlighted, though, in the time the cabin, the windows zaukuporeny and most importantly - has disappeared from his childhood favorite mummy's head with protruding teeth! We will not see it with you, as their ears now. Remember, ladies and gentlemen.

I had a suspicion that in these halls all the spoil, when their sly closed some time ago - and failed. But now is not dusty and everything shines! As if in a museum can not be dusty? It's sad.

Another sweet deal in the Pushkin Museum - Hall of Michelangelo. Everything is shifted away, Moses hauled from place to place, sticking upright body (not the most beautiful), dozens of chairs around. Here, then, there are concerts. Of course, this is fine, but what's the Michelangelo? For that he furnish the plastic chairs and suppress organ chrome pipes? Such is the smallest stadium turned out, not Hall of the Italian genius. Maybe there is also a cafe open? And the name, for example, the "Pieta"? So what? Sounds!

Well, that Flemish painting in the hall of the place, "Satire is a guest of the farmer," Jordaens hung for some reason the Dutch landscape Konninka I generally keep quiet. How can you not see that the dark red walls look cool Konninka not lie - an enigma.

That's what was done to Eg. Hall:

Text apologetic:
http://museum-ru.livejournal.com/42091.html

Photo:
http://victorsolkin.livejournal.com/454788.html


As it was (see thumbnail)

Then you have to restore the museum im.Pushkina.