Please help me identify those costumes

[redbor]

yes?
Could not see.

But, then, is another sign, not as in Figures website

handwriting and other inscriptions, and the images are, obviously, made by another hand.

IMHO.
signature after all, should be such.

A monogram VR, it was an early sign, even before 1917

[tivat]

Сообщение от redbor

yes?
Could not see.

But, then, is another sign, not as in Figures website

handwriting and other inscriptions, and the images are, obviously, made by another hand.

IMHO.
signature after all, should be such.

A monogram VR, it was an early sign, even before 1917

Signature matches.

[Сима]

Good afternoon , colleagues. Once turned to me and publicly, and in a personal need to express their opinions. I do not know fully the entire corpus of sketches VM Khodasevich to the " Golden Age ". The presented figures seem to me helpless and in some places (ie, in these figures, there are "places" ), the secondary , ie authenticity . In 1930, VM was still a powerful artist with a strong and stylish pattern , as forms were created primarily by constructivist means of expression. That is, and for the image of the character and costume in the sketch itself was characterized by a strong graphical dominant. ( This can be seen in the forum users found sketches ). In Thumbnail hidden figure in general, and watercolor form practically not found. Therefore, it seems to me that this is a copy. But for final approval would be good to know all the thumbnails to Khodasevich " Golden Age " and find the prototype .

While I was going to respond , your discussion has gone far Then I would add that here I would have to sign drew the least attention .

[tivat]

Сообщение от Shem

Khodasevich sketches to the "Golden Age" and find the prototype.

Approximately, so?

[Сима]

tivat, no, no idea of ​​the costume (in this case, the pockets on the naked body), and this particular song.

[tivat]

Сообщение от Shem

tivat, no, no idea of ​​the costume (in this case, the pockets on the naked body), and this particular song.

Seema, and if the thumbnails in the folder mimine is not approved?
But try to look for, even interesting.
>

True, the dancers look for in shoes is difficult.
>

[Сима]

Сообщение от tivat; 1875331"

from the folder mimine

It would be nice to know that even in this daddy relevant , apparently, not only to the design of the ballet. There must be other materials, choreography , for example. It's Daddy 's how we see the Treasury . Was, MB in storage. Therefore , by the way , and stamp on pictures. Confirm the identity of an archive, museum or staging . At the Imperial Theater in Make-Up library contains copies of , for example. with Korovin, and it is with stamps .

Сообщение от tivat; 1875331 "

is not approved

so there on the second , in my opinion, it says " option " , no? MB working copies , this is easily in the theater . But I would not spend more time on looking at , but look at the museum and the theater would still interesno.I photographic material . I have one right by the " visyak " to the " Golden Age " with a strange signature. This is despite the fact that I consider other formulations .

[Отшельник]

Сообщение от Shem

It would be nice to know that even in this daddy

... A daddy no more nothing, only 7 figures

[redbor]

Сообщение от tivat

signature matches.

Not really something.
But all the writing on the drawings?
Quite a different handwriting!

Сообщение от tivat

about, so

So >

[Сима]

It would be nice to see the other 5.