Authorship - Morozov AI (1835-1904)?

[tunec33]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

I think that it is not necessary, because value assessment may exceed the cost of this work.

Here is more of a "semi-" may be a graduate of art school or a self-taught talent.

What is theoretically suitable for "early Morozov AI" . But the cost of the examination (tysch. 25) will obviously cost more pictures, even in this "best" case. : (

Or frost-Lasso, but again, early (once more with "v").


In general, not a museum painting ... Wherever her up?

[tunec33]

Strange ...

Received e-mail from the Russian Museum. Photos sent there a month ago, with a similar question (whether to make examination or as soon as they understand everything.). Moreover, under the sauce, he wanted to convey a picture in a museum, but would not want to make people laugh museum workers, etc.

Here is their response:

The Russian Museum does not hold scientific advice on the art-nature photography. Scientific advice is carried out within 1.5 months and costs 17,700 rubles. Constitute the treaty and the expiration of advice, you will be issued letter on the letterhead of the Russian Museum to confirm or not confirm this or that artist. The picture should bring to the museum.

How will we take? Just a form letter?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tunec33

The picture should bring to the museum.

And so it is.
To me, the answer is fairly short, but exhaustive. All told, explained ...
And what do you want?
Expert opinion by e-mail get?

[tunec33]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And so it is.
And what do you want?
Expert opinion by e-mail get?

Of course not.

Originally wanted to give the painting to the museum (including free). But to know in advance, and not whether they would send me to her, or whether she lost in the vaults ...

Judging from the discussion here on the forum, the authorship is doubtful, but the quality corresponds to the "semi". As for the idea should have been clear and RM. However, instead of "excuse me, but this is unlikely Morozov, they offer me to pay (for the same response) 18 thousand and that after the proposal to give them free ...

In my opinion, the answer is already known to them, the picture is not needed, but want to exploit the situation and "peel money: - /

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tunec33

picture is not needed, but want to exploit the situation and "peel the money": - /

Your picture of course is not needed, and without your "18 thousand" they're not lost, I think. But watching her will, if you brought, but it is already worth the money.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от tunec33

The Russian Museum does not hold scientific advice on the art-nature photography. Scientific advice is carried out within 1.5 months and costs 17,700 rubles. Constitute the treaty and the expiration of advice, you will be issued letter on the letterhead of the Russian Museum to confirm or not confirm this or that artist. The picture should bring to the museum.

All right, they wrote. This is up to you to give work to the examination or not. Your work is not itself a museum-level and therefore Russian Museum is not needed, but you will be on hand expertise in which experts make clear that this is the frost. Accordingly, the work at once will cost 17,700 rubles. expensive Provided that existed attributed Morozov as an artist, not as an amateur with a common surname.

[tunec33]

And yet ... Once all the pictures together. "One and the same hand" or clearly not?

The first two - "Hunters of the fire, the following 4 - real Morozov AI

[tunec33]

Another found Morozov AV, author chromolithography 1885, here.

And the book, designed Morozov-Lass (here), refers to the cover ...

Here they are: