The process for the exhibition "Forbidden Art 2006" is nearing completion

[luka77]

Сообщение от artcol

My question is to understand this: if there is an article of the Criminal Code, under which falls the exhibition is this, on why everyone is talking about their right to speak, about the art without borders expressions, and other nonsense but are silent about the validity of this law, about the legitimacy of this article, in the end? It's a key question?

I think that much can rake for this article, but here is why do not quite understand. The law can be interpreted differently the same event, concerning morality and feelings of people. Common sense and objectivity sidelined when fanatically minded masses prove that they have insulted and "bad people" incited religious hatred.
In such a case may be, and representatives of other faiths to understand and support if they start huff because of lack of status and gos.prazdnika weekend holiday in their New Year or Christmas (eg, Rosh Hashanah Nowruz). Indeed, recall, the Constitution:

Article 14
1. Russian Federation - a secular state. No religion may be established as a state or compulsory.
2. Religious associations are separated from the state and equal before the law.

What would happen?

good idea to do these days and weekends, who would not want

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от SAH

Recently, another police (read state. System), with dogs standing in front of the church at Easter, hampered by car station visit Pochaev monastery (I list this from personal experience).

Yes, these zigzagging out of the frying pan into the fire "and discourages many from both the ROC is a public body. In this way, our error tsekovnogo leadership.
In pursuit of sueminutnym, wanting faster-bstree fill parishes, they do the reverse effect, yes, I'm afraid, is already achieved.

But that's another topic ...

[kr555]

Yes, in general, the church itself in this process is very shortsighted led in my opinion, and added quite a few people among its detractors. At the end of the process, they realized the error, went to an interview that the plant should not have, but it was somehow sluggish, too late and without the proper effect.
In general, from such authorities as the present, and of its instruments, it would clearly distance itself, if the church has a desire to remain for a society with something holy and sublime, and such unity in the long run can greatly damage the reputation. After 1917, no amount of not guilty priests suffer because people are angry with their rotten government associate ... Now we are certainly not threatened by revolution, but the anger in the community already.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[dedulya37]

[Konstantin]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[SAH]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[SAH]