Russian art market in 2017

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1948551"

and you can easily write a review of Art- Manege , missing half of the exhibition and the artists in this part do not meet the taste of the editor .

Easily. If the shaft , you can skip is not half and five-sixths . The editor , without giving up personal preferences, based on the criteria stated in the site name . " Auction " artists in different price ranges. Life is so . But at the same time welcome any alternative view as text . And this is not necessary to be an editor.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Konstantin

It's funny, sometimes very sincerely and in my opinion.

Pathetic buffoon this Lozhkin.


"Go away ... the best coaches in cats!"
(C)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Nice phrase, but I can not imagine any outcome. Explosion? What? Pictures? Prices? And as a result of the explosion that? The change of government last?

The number always turns into quality. Links to Sotheby's Christie's is not consistent, because it has its own criteria, tastes, and artists, and levels should be compared with them. These avant-garde artists of the 20s grew up not too long ago and only strong in comparison. Failed to wait. The people will not get rich, and the revolution can be, but who knows what. Good times do not happen or has already been. It's all about how to do business. I'm waiting for the explosion of sales and poumneniya.

Cyril Syzran

Yes, this is your mantra all learned.
Great Soviet painting, by the way, and at Western auctions for sale - and Pimenov, and Popkov, and Stozharau, and Gerasimov same.

This mantra is not mine.
You already got it, too. You all know and do not miss the masterpieces, I really do not know what you mean by that. Clearly the birches and soenki. But they have different artists are different. In Kuinzhi and classic Vladimir Kokurina school, a brilliant show that you are on the forum somehow missed. Entirely in vain. By the way the work of these artists are very much appreciated, and the money too.
I do think all these cries about the lack of market and underripe our art can be reduced to, ask me and I will pay you everything you'll get.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

By the way the work of these artists are very much appreciated, and in denga too.

Got it, thanks.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1948221"

Well, of course, the participant

Thank you

Сообщение от Seriy; 1948221"

had exhibitions of his name on the round table in the NCCA, it contracts, as an artist, with the media.

Seriy, thanks for the info. And what a round table dedicated to the NCCA, which it called? What meetings have included in their collections of his works? Can you tell if already have the information.

Сообщение от Seriy; 1948551"

you go out into the real world, you suddenly discover that all these opinions, to put it mildly, untrue. Artists who do not like the editor-thrive, Bob Lozhkin more and more popular, not only in Russia but also abroad

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 1948591"

Where is the "real world" vision of success Wasi Lozhkina?
Where can I see it in real life, rather than the Internet? Where?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 1948591"

Come on, let's about success. Who is against? "Analyze", for example, I looked this analysis and see.
Only here the success of that call? Number of views in the network?

Join on the COP.

Сообщение от Maskit; 1948631"

discussing Vasya Lozhkina won him a certain importance in the market, the market simply is not on ART

Well, this is surely not terribly > If what he's doing - Art, sooner or later come to the art market, and "without" AI. If not - will simply be market.
And those who were merchandised hardly care about the opinion of Forum. Who can hurt (or help) discussion of this figure?

Сообщение от iside; 1948641"

IV, if you do not mind I would say, though I admit the fact that you're asking me about similar nekolko struck.

Of course not - I wonder your opinion. Nothing amazing - I do not Nicodemus assessed or no involvement of the artist in the art market in the process of his artistic performance. This is a new approach for me (maybe because of naivete))). Some authors I personally can not name the artists, there is a good auction results, exhibitions, they are engaged in the gallery ...

About Lozhkin I've heard, though his work and am not interested, so I was surprised when I heard the view that anything to do with the art market, he has not. How so? - I thought - it can not be the same about him on every corner taldychat! However, when I began searching for evidence of his involvement in an art-market process, we did not find anything (which, I confess, surprised me)

Сообщение от iside; 1948641"

No, the artist Lozhkin not a party to the art market

Thank you, iside

Сообщение от iside; 1948641"

Even the gallery and not all are included in the system of the art market. For example, the gallery is a member of Aidan Salakhova art market, and some the gallery, which distributes thin-suvenironoy product that never gets any prestigious collections, or at auctions or to museums - is not.

Well, at auctions, sometimes, the authors have come to the level (in my opinion)

Сообщение от iside; 1948641"

Everyone, of course, decide for itself

Here, I decide - I study the question: "An artist in the art market - the criteria for participation" (I myself do not understand))
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=148181

Сообщение от iside; 1948641"

but I assure you that listening to (reading)
Cyril Syzran can learn many useful and necessary

Yes, I know

[Maskit]

The smaller the artist himself participates in the art market , the better for the general case , the example at the next auction Gelos by the artist Natto Konyshev provided work for mid-sized 2,000 rubles , with Samvel site smaller size of her works exhibited 700 cu . There are lots of examples and vice versa - space- mismatched prices. The artist must trust for his own benefit specialists on trade iskusstvom.A have a mess of distrust and the general inability .

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Maskit

at the next auction Gelos by the artist Natto Konyshev provided work for mid-sized 2,000 rubles

At an auction in the bidding process can increase the price several times.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Toinen

At an auction in the bidding process can increase the price several times.

This work has exposed Gelos Natta in 2000.
No one can do to put himself in Gelos.

[Maskit]

The mere fact that an artist drags his work at auction , and agree to receive for it in the hands of 1,500 r . says a lot, and then work in the future and can go to the bottom of a rub . It does not matter if it's put someone esche.Mozhno think that it is not important and the work went for nothing , but when the figures recording , work on the auction provided by the author , ' is another matter. Paul , Gelos himself little to expose , and the artists themselves and their families regularly . And in the case of Natto specifically , as evidenced by a note on the auction site .

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Maskit

The fact that the artist drags his work at auction , and agree to receive for it in the hands of 1,500 r . says a lot, and then work in the future and can go to the bottom of a rub . It does not matter if it's put someone esche.Mozhno think that it is not important and the work went for nothing , but when the figures recording , work on the auction provided by the author , ' is another matter. Paul , Gelos himself little to expose , and the artists themselves and their families regularly . And in the case of Natto specifically , as evidenced by a note on the auction site .

I repeat once again that of Natta did not depend in determining the price . She really needs , and therefore forced to raise the price that will be offered. This Gelos guilty, all claims against him. Underpricing is the policy of Gelos and demonstration of its relationship to the artists and not only.