Fakes ... Fakes ...

[OlegTsi]

Yes, this often does not have to see ...

Expert (Expert Contact Robert Roland) at auction Roland New York, 80 East 11th Street, New York, NY 10 003
offers its customers a oil painting ... art gallery with a sticker > > >

Lot 15
 
Russian Oil on Canvas Board , Still Life

Depicts fruit and jeweled goblet. Image: 19 "x 23 ", Frame: 25 "x 29". Chipping at edges with scuffs and scratches. Bears gallery label and inscription on back, both in Cyrillic.

Estimate $ 100 - $ 200

And a lover of Russian oil is found ...
There are 1 other bids on this item.
Just do not know Where did the river landscape ? ? >
 

[Toinen]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Expert (Expert Contact Robert Roland)

And what an "expert" did not even bother "gallery label to" translate?

One word - an expert!

Added after 3 minutes
OlegTsi, and in general for such fraud on the forum has a section "Funny Pictures, humor and satire"

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev ; 1949421"

Under the studs must have meant the hairpins.

Even more so. Often, they were like jewels, consisting of several parts . And those who were straight, had a length of about 5 cm wooden toothpick Try to take sharp and vtyknut the keyhole.
The muscle of this century is the fastest muscle in your body. So, to put out the eye through the keyhole of the boy - hairpin hairpins - an incredibly difficult task. Well, right now , and no explanation is clear.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Well, right now, and no explanation is clear.

Indeed.

[Toinen]

Previously, browsing online auction catalogs, seeing such a "masterpiece" is simply not paying attention, but it turns out details are very funny

[OlegTsi]

November 1, 2011 in New York, Sotheby's held its sale, "Masterpieces of Russian Art," were presented to 26 lots, including a number 6byla picture of Ivan Trush "Gagilki", 1921. Even the fact that at such prestigious auction appeared a picture of Lviv artist, was weird. The description slipped even a phrase like: "One of the best works Trush, depicting Gagilki - holiday ... and TE" Care 80.500 dollars.

In the provenance is written - "From a private collection in New Jersey, USA, purchased from the author, then by inheritance."

Lviv National Museum of Art is painting Trush, entitled "Gutsulki near the church," dating from the 1920 year.

If one compares the museum to work with sotbisovskoy, then comes the view that the latter - a compilation. Pay attention to the story, he has changed in meaning. At the museum's work - the central action of this young gutsulki and elation on their faces. The girl - it's just an intermediate character between gutsulkami and the crowd, which (the crowd), by the way, well spelled out.

At sotbisovskoy - the girl has become a central character, it recovered Licko (fatten), persons gutsulok not visible, the crowd spread out, the church has not left and not an element of the church, and namazyukana right, items of clothing for simplified, unfinished. In short, the many differences, but the elements are familiar. And the signature is not so hot.

I can not beat his chest and scream "fake", but even I can not say that this is the original from Trush. Why should he have done such a picture, which is inferior to the previous skills. By the way, Trush forged during his lifetime. Forge today.

Do not smell it here bygone days kerosene and gentlemen?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Well, you never know what happens.
Remember Deineka used their old stories and old characters in the later pictures? (" Tractor ", for example , is from 1930 ) , girls and guys are running into the water to bathe , etc.
Not to mention the Repin, who made different versions of " Unexpected " ...

In principle it is.

And the fact that the church foolishly rubbed in my view , this argument only "yes" .

The painting was easy and good , except that I personally do not see a particular stylistic similarities between the two pictures ...

[AlexSpb]

Oleg Tsi, srazuskazhu that you honestly think the real expert in all matters relating to Burliuk, and myself - so ... something vaguely heard. So, God forbid me, in some duels on these issues with you to get involved. All I'm going to write, it's just little explanation.

AlexSpb, in your 2 messages at once two different versions of the one-eyed Burliuk - from Livshits, with bath and fiction from Svetlana Ignatenko.

Well, Livshits book at hand and that was not quite so face in the dirt does not hit, crawled in the search there and found a second version. And about Svetlana Ignatenko did not hear before, so there, and wrote: "Here, he found that something."
The idea about the beautiful Lady Godiva, but I agree with the fact that his brother shoulder such false accusations are unlikely to have no purpose. Here Livshits was not the worst istochnikrm, nevertheless, in 20e years the book was published, under the following description hardly fits.

At a time when impunity can write whatever you want, hacks and will continue to pour out to the press various stupid "sensationalism".

I just got up today, "Polutoraglazogo Sagittarius" and I must confess, there is nothing like not found . And at that time (15-20 years), I do not have much on this subject read, that is, look at otgadku Kalaushinskih, say volumes about Burliuk, had no meaning. But to take this needle I'm somewhere had! Not Vasily Kamensky as I subtracted about her! There remained, however, still weaker version, that my first "Sagittarius" was published in the American ed-ve them. Chekhov, in the 1978m, it seems, and may differ from the text where the Soviet (as it was different, for example, in a separately published in the 32m by Burliuk "Gilee" Lifshitz). But, I felt that it - by ...
Still searching rewarded!

"... And I lost an eye during the August coup, parting with a minor-krovosmeshenkoy siren in '91, to see what somewhere further my research on Lady Godiva and vytknutom knitting needle Burliuk oceans ..."

Yes, it Kuzminski in New York at the time I was loading these "Apocrypha"! 9 volumes of wool to the Blue Lagoon in search of a specific reference has no power, and not sure whether it makes sense. Besides, maybe it's him and not there ...

And show off, please us at our pictures of Nicholas Burliuk by which one can determine its nature.

Could not find fault, and so it is clear that on pics to determine the nature, we must as a minimum - especially science physiognomy to learn. But there is, such of it reviewed

"The third son, Nicholas, a tall, overgrown boy, was a poet. Shy, krasnevshy for each access to it even more when he himself had to speak out, he was distinguished by extreme gentleness, bore silent resentment, and for this the brothers mockingly referred to him by Christ."

You could have something more akin to find. Nevertheless, the desire of authority - the law, got into a bookcase, pictures look. One, no matter what the truth is not pretending spread. There, in the bins and found quite a voluminous stack of American publications Burliuk. With pleasure I would give them cheaply in good hands. There's great for autographs, and some have. But most of one problem: when the previous owner to part with his wife, she, before he took things as they might, mutilated his library. Some almost preserved, some broken, but about half, as they say, can not be restored.

There is time, and here I am writing in detail ... But in general, with a much greater interest than to clarify the issue about the loss of the eye, would have learned something about the picture Burliuk "Execution of Marie Antoinette on Red Square in Moscow." The late author of the monograph Boris Matveyevich Kalaushin, I remember, I was infected with his enthusiasm in finding as to its fate ... Yes, and it was a good artist, theorist avant-garde solo exhibition at the Russian Museum was. I will try today or tomorrow to find and put it in another section of photographs of his work, remaining with relatives. I'm sure someone, they suggest ...

Still, until the pile, spread donative my books and Kuzminski (with picture) - Kalaushina.

[AlexSpb]

Still , after , I think , once collectors are present here , purposefully buying Burliuk is probably worth mentioning that the ocean in the primary source , the descendants have preserved much of his work. The hosts - the people there and I malopredskazuemye stopped to buy anything before the crisis , when prices were not that - sky-high , but at least , not dealers . Well, buy something that runs directly from the house, slightly overpaying for it , it is still , as they say - not so bad , but , in my understanding and the number of false Burliuks, which is present in the market, its decently ditched ...
However, if someone has serious intentions in this regard , I think, any suggestions there may have been obtained

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Yes, and the signature is not so hot.

Trush signed his paintings in Latin Polish version - Iwan Trusz /I.
Trusz /Iw.
Trusz.


In Poland, a lot of his works sold.
There are very good.