Photo: Exhibition of nominees "Kandinsky Prize-2008"

[Ilona]

Exposition.
11-12. Thanatos Bonionis. Soldier's Bible. Pieta. 2008. HD video, high sample silver, titanium, rubber, 205h39h113.
13-15. Marina Fedorova. Project singles. 2007 - 2008. Acrylic on canvas, oil. 25 paintings.
16. Nicholas Rykunov. From white to black. 2007. Photography. 9 works. 100x100 each.
17-20. Andrei Blokhin, Georgy Kuznetsov. Project: Recycle, 2007 - 2008.
Capacity in the white balls, like snow, which appear and disappear human footprints. I was told that this is part installatsii - before this volume was a screen on which the spinning roller, where a person leaves the viewer in the snow, and more must be heard the crunch of snow. And since "there is no concept of purity."
The surface of the work with young pictures of celebrities - it пупырчатый polyethylene, which can devour by clicking on the photo.

[Ilona]

Exposition.
21-23. Igor Pestov. Civilization consumption. Total consumption. 2007 - 2008. Oil on canvas.
24. Multi-layer polyethylene, each layer painted part of the human body.
25-26. Alexander von Bush. Art Tour. Masterpieces from the streets. 2008. Artist - designer of the project Sergey Soloviev.
27-28. Nicholas Nasedkin. Objects.
29. Hope Anfalova. "Zone of the garden.
30. Sergey Shekhovtsov. Tron. 2007. Installation.

[Ilona]

Exposition.
31-33. Aidan Salakhova. From a series of Persian miniatures. 2007 - 2008. Gouache, watercolor, gold paint.
34. Anna acorn. Project: Establishment of culture. 2008. Metal, welding.
35-37. Olga Stone. Project: Fine Line. 2007 - 2008. Paper, charcoal pencil.
38-40. Dmitry Vrubel and Victoria Timofeeva.

[Ilona]

Exposition.
41-46. Oleg Dou. : cool: Proekt.Toystory. Flexible photography, mixed media. 8 photos exhibited in a separate room.
Personal opinion: perhaps the most interesting thing on this show. I do like this photographer. By the way, he is in the statistics of auction sales on this site.
The fact that such plasticized picture, read here.
http://www.fotozoom.ru/fb/fbnews1614.htm

47-50. More projects, the names and authors of which I have not recorded (excuse).

[Ilona]

Afterword.
I do not understand this so-called "contemporary relevance" art ", so I do not love him. Well, or do not like, and therefore do not understand. Just believe that you need to be aware of what is happening on the contemporary art scene. And a campaign for such an exhibition is quite enough. This is a good, big dose of "aktualschiny" (forgive forgiveness from those who enjoy this activity). Once again, I became convinced that it is not mine. Impressions year is enough, until the next award.
Let's wait rewarding.

At snack funny story.

Читать дальше... 

The same day, November 6, in the evening and 1 channel in the news gave a report on the opening of the exhibition. In an interview with Shalva Breus (publisher of the journal Arthrornika, see website Award) said that this art possible and surprising and shocking someone. But the picture of Manet "Luncheon on the Grass" is also at one time caused a scandal by their appearance, and now a classic.
Last night, watching "Gordon Quixote, where have criticized the Comedie-Club. So, Garik Martirosyan said that "Manet painting" Luncheon on the Grass "is also at one time caused a scandal by their appearance, and now a classic," only a few other words.

http://impressionnisme.narod.ru/MANE/mane_big.htm

Without going into details of the difference between Man and all that was photographed, I will say:
He would know Eduard Manet, that with the aid of his masterpiece will try to justify the various manifestations of modern ... well, let's call it culture, would not have written his "breakfast" at all.

See you at the forum.

[fross]

Originally Posted by Ilona

Last night, watching "Gardon Quixote, where have criticized the Comedie-Club". So, Garik Martirosyan said that "Manet painting" Luncheon on the Grass "is also at one time caused a scandal by their appearance, and now a classic," only a few other words.

U-di-vi-tional talent, and innate., In any other way to find such insolence impossible: to compare themselves and Manet.

[Wladzislaw]

Originally Posted by Ilona

I do not understand this so-called "contemporary relevance" art ", so I do not love him. Well, or do not like, so I do not understand.

In general, "modern" and "relevance" - are two different species. Here on the forums, where some have more written about the difference.

[Ilona]

Originally Posted by Wladzislaw

In general, "modern" and "relevance" - are two different species. Here on the forums, where some have more written about the difference.

On terms.
"Modern" and current "do not contradict each other. Actual always contemporary, and others can not. And the modern means its only a temporary membership and is not necessarily relevant to the content. Therefore, in my opinion, the joint use of the word" contemporary relevance Art fully and accurately defines the phenomenon, but you can just say "the actual art."

[Wladzislaw]

Originally Posted by Ilona

ABOUT terms.
"Modern" and current "do not contradict each other. Actual always contemporary, and others can not. And the modern means its only a temporary membership and is not necessarily relevant to the content. Therefore, in my opinion, the joint use of the word" contemporary relevance Art fully and accurately defines the phenomenon, but you can just say "actual art".

Formal logic is often flawed. You present a conceptual misunderstanding of the difference.

[Ilona]

Originally Posted by Wladzislaw

Formal logic is often flawed. You present a conceptual misunderstanding of the difference.

Dear forum users.
1. Let's remember why I go to the exhibition with a camera. I do photos, so you Tell A about some event that a site on which I work was interesting, so that together we can discuss the exhibition, paintings, artists. With this I can express my personal opinion. But never anyone does not prove anything and not trying to convince the right.
2. Is not the first time confronted with a sarcastic reflection on the words and terms. However, some of you have admitted that they are not art critics. So why spend time and effort to prove that art is not right? But I said nothing, when someone wrote Nouveau and Art Nouveau comma - as a listing of styles ... From my side it would be unseemly to teach unfamiliar to me a man who may have older and wiser than me.
3. In my experience I know that people who use the word "concept", are often adepts of modern art and fiercely defend it.
Thank you. The debate on this invite to complete.