Vahan Ananian (1959 - 2006)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

let us not argue about taste!

Yes, indeed, we all have different tastes.
I liked the painting here, however, as the site ...

[artcol]

Work on the site (as described later period), any comparison does not come with "kikasovskimi (early ?)... Pleasing to the eye, the formalism is almost gone, the color of the net ...
But I love more realism (where "literature") or pure experimentation (pure formalism). And all that in the middle - somehow passed. I feel kind of salon in this, "ponaroshechnost", "game".

[luna]

Сообщение от artcol

"Not seeing live" - I agree, but this is only a painting, "kontemporari" (or national?). Academic can even look in b /w photos, and everything will be immediately clear.

You can estimate qualitativeness painting on photographs, b /w-version? - Take off my hat - you are brilliant!

Any art was once "kontemporari" and rejection of the proponents of academic painting of the new directions related to the endless stories - to argue about meaningless.
Of course - "like" - "not like" - is a criterion, but very subjective.

[artcol]

Сообщение от luna

You can evaluate qualitativeness painting on photographs, b /w-version? - Take off my hat - you are brilliant!

Thank you. Previously reproductions of classics were often in black /white version, and nothing looked, and all was clear. But what "good art" enlighten?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от luna

Academic can even be watch in b /w photos, and thereALL just be clear.

Read carefully, young lady, he's not evaluates the quality, and understands what is written there.

[fross]

Сообщение от artcol

Thanks. Previously reproductions of classics were often in black /white version, and nothing looked, and all was clear. But what "good art" enlighten?

Probably similar to quality food: looked, smelled, chewed, and understood everything. But with painting just looked at the photos (but colorful!) And also understood.
But I now know what to call it that satisfied many, often drinking and fun - happening!

[artcol]

Сообщение от fross

Perhaps by analogy with quality food: looked, smelled, chewed, and understood everything. But with painting just looked at the photos (but colorful!) And also understood.
But I now know what to call it that satisfied many, often drinking and fun - happening!

Yes But I was so interested in the word - "quality"? It's like "two big differences," or what?

[fross]

Сообщение от artcol

Yes But I was so interested in the word - "quality"? It's like "two big differences," or something?

No-e. "Two big" is when quality and poor, and between them so thin stripes, well, or not quite slim.

[luna]

Dictionary: Quality:
"Property express quality, to be detectable, lessons from its quality. Qualitativeness object. It seems to me fits the definition of art of the highest quality. Because there is a variant: "Come, do not be stingy, buy Ms-in-Fiz!"

Сообщение от artcol

Thanks. Previously reproductions of classics were often in black /white version, and nothing looked, and all was clear. But what "good art" enlighten?

Of course, it is clear that depicted, but as ...
For those who are still interested in the work Vahan - attaching an article PhD in Art Olga Savitsky (St. Petersburg).

[luna]

If you have responded to the theme and went here - perhaps you know Vahan.
Now we are preparing a book about Vaganov, so I ask all those who have something to remember from personal contact with him - write to me or e-mail: kilpvahan@ukr.net. Along with the book to produce a catalog of his works and expanded web site - www.vahan-gallery.com.ua. If you have any of his work and would like them to be represented in the catalog or website - Please, send them an electronic version with the name, year of writing and sizes at the same address. Thank you.