Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

For 39-year?

Sure.

Because by this time had long been over, and he just woke up.

Ortega y Gasset in any years better than writing.

And much.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Ortega y Gasset in any years better than writing.

But whether he knew Repin?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от rainyday

but their realism is not quite the same realism
that Repin

Do not quite understand.

Repin (in the best years) the same realism that, for instance, Millet, Chardin, Guardi, Velazquez and others

Do not see any differences.

You can say that C-F school "realism" of another type?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Y Repin (in the best years)

This is what is-best?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But whether he knew Repin?

I think yes.

He was generally very well educated man.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

He was generally very well educated man.

And you did Rebelión de las Masas read in Spanish?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is what is, "best years"?

Well, "Pirogov", sleeping in a chair from the Saratov Museum, and the early "Preparing for the exam."
But you never know ...

Repin many wonderful works.

And what do you do not like Ilya Efimovich?

I'm not saying what he was draftsman ...

Added after 37 seconds

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And you do Rebelión de las Masas read in Spanish?

No, only in Russian.

I'm in Spanish I do not read.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

No, only in Russian.

In Soviet translation?

[rainyday]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Do not quite understand.

Repin (in the best years) the same realism that, for instance, Millet, Chardin, Guardi, Velazquez and others

Do not see any differences.

You can say that C-F school "realism" of another type?

Yes that's right - abstracted realism
that was not Repinsky realism
Repin, although I really respect and kitsch have nicknamed it did not,

for artists' posleabstraktsionistov "
so to speak

depicted object is only cause
for painting as an organization of color and form in the plane of the canvas
and how to write books:
story concocted for any resemblance to real people and events
artist is not responsible

therefore such categories as
"and I got the color," rather than a crooked vase "
such an artist simply can not think

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

Of course, you're right. But I talked about the work of these artists in the years 1940-60. Where, in my opinion, can and should speak about the rejection of abstraction. Returning to her Diberkorna (Series Ocean Park Paintings), and Bischoff goes beyond the reporting period. Nevertheless, I admit my guilt - I have not specified the time frame rassmatrizhvaemogo directions.

thanks

the only thing that I
"rejection of abstraction" does not seem
return to the old realism
as some opportunistic step back
or floating with the party line

such as the pampered and that's enough --
need to do business again

on the contrary - I think it is a movement
perfectly reasonable and natural
is an honest study of borders in both directions
and finding its place among

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

In Soviet translation?

Hmm. Translated Geleskula for the History of Aesthetics in monuments and documents. "

He had been reduced as necessary.

Wholly he published in Problems of Philosophy "in 1989, but I have not seen.

However, with Ortega, I was never going to read.