Rate it now

[Mona]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Ninevia, unless you do not see that this is a reproduction pasted on cardboard?

Well, somehow I could not assume that the evaluation seriously suggest reproduction on cardboard. Fine by the way can be almost modern. In 40-s really made great reproductions? a quality even more? then the photos were retouched and murky black and white painted top. It is unlikely that one could make a reproduction of cardboard with such a resolution then. This is a modern quality last 15 years with ... and the cost of this $ 1000.
 If this picture is 40 years, how signed copy of the name of a rather famous artist?

In short, remove the frame, сфоткайте canvas side and rear (if it is canvas)
Board immediately make a stand for the pan

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Mona

In 40-ies really made great reproductions? a quality even more? then the photos were retouched and murky black and white painted top. It is unlikely that one could make a reproduction of cardboard with such a resolution THEN.

You have not confused and do not frighten

[Mona]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

You have not confused and do not frighten

And already scared that I ? somewhere the owner of the picture missing. Syzran scared. But on a cardboard canvas original - this one. And on cardboard printing, reproduction - is another. We need more and the size - and suddenly it 20x30? such works from this author enough. And also to clarify - this is a reproduction, print or canvas \\ oil. Even the cards of good quality then was not. In any case, such as the premises of the photo

Shl. She looked again. No, it can not be photographic 40 years. At the level of those years are not drawn. At x \\ m like, with the constricted for the second time in a non-native stretcher