"Lyalya naked Viktor Reikhet. Who knows where she is?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

success is not always in direct proportion to the artistic value of works

We are talking about:

Сообщение от Mona

the success of trade

Is it possible to successfully sell the work, unable to "thin. Values"?
It seems to me, no.
Another question is about themselves "thin. Values".
Someone sees a "thin. Values" in the "lilac still lifes, and someone Give" abstract expressionism ".
But the most tasteless thing as you sell?
I do not know how to sell a naked maiden with a sword riding a tiger, for example.
Or a white Pegasus ... Krasiiiiiivo!
Although this may cause the viewer with emotion-now and thin. Value. "

[LCR]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

We are talking about:

Is it possible to successfully sell the work, unable to "thin. Values"?
It seems to me, no.
Another question is about themselves "thin. Values".
Someone sees a "thin. Values" in the "lilac still lifes, and someone Give" abstract expressionism ".
But the most tasteless thing as you sell?
I do not know how to sell a naked maiden with a sword riding a tiger, for example.
Or a white Pegasus ... Krasiiiiiivo!
Although this may cause the viewer with emotion-now and thin. Value ".

To me, it can, without problems. Look, look at this Gapchinskuyu or Galchinsky - that is not "quite tasteless thing? Or is Taka artist, Hans Zattska - not just tasteless, but the quintessence of bad taste, just stunned - because someone is selling it, even on this forum ads, I think, were. I now climbed to watch the price (http://www.findartinfo.com/search/li..._P._Ronsard%29) - is about as early Monticelli, can you imagine?
In general, the horrific examples mass.

In one you, Kirill, who can not, there is a dozen experts, only whistle

Another thing - what is the artistic value. But this tale of a white bull, we are not going to repeat, right? I still do not decide, just badmouthing go!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

The one you, Cyril, who can not, there is a dozen experts, only whistle

do believe ...
Gapchinskaya! About! But she herself and sell!

When the cases - I'm hiding from the oars,
When fooling around - play the fool,
A mix of these two crafts
There is a dark adept, I'm not one of them. (c)

[iside]

Сообщение от LCR

The one you, Cyril, who can not, there is a dozen experts, only whistle

LCR, I think that art dealers have a specialization in one specific form of paintings, and it is composed, of course, the fact that he can sell what he likes and what a range of clients different approaches.
Cyril Syzransky sells one, I - the other, and AlexanderG - the third, wharf - the fourth and not the fact that if we will change the pictures of each other will be able to sell something, only clients scared

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

Look, look at this Gapchinskuyu

No, this example does not fit.

Сообщение от LCR

Or is such an artist, Hans Zattska

Also, I think not.
He was already relatively low, it is already in the history of how our entirely too odious slonnno salons, yet it "kitchuha, but the old, still on the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts graduating in 1882.
No, let's take our now living.
Classmates
Shilov /Safronov? Generals of kitsch, vulgarity marshals?
There they are on the market? You can buy them? Someone is selling them?
Safronov Safronov himself.
Shilov?
I do not know, I have two or three landscapes seen it on the market.
Who else?
Examples?

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от LCR

To me, it can, without problems. Look, look at this Gapchinskuyu or Galchinsky - that is not "quite tasteless thing"?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

No, this example is not suitable.

I will not apologize for the naive question - why "picture" Gapchinskoy not suitable as an example of "quite tasteless things"?
Maybe Mr. Art - dealer Cyril Syzransky formulate a response without verses and sayings.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Also not sure.
There are all willing and very many, tasty ...

Oh, no! (The question is philosophical!) Tasty-unprofitable! From delicious, get fat!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

why "picture" Gapchinskoy not suitable as an example of "quite tasteless things"?

You do not carefully read my text.
Actually, the conversation goes on sale dealers "completely tasteless things"?
In my opinion, it is the dealers do not sell things Gapchinskoy.
She is now doing very well. Well, about "successful" is not for me to judge, actually, but what a lively discussion of its themes potent gapchinskimi "I realized that this view of its promotion they have created.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, about "successful" is not for me to judge, actually, but what a lively discussion of its themes potent gapchinskimi "I realized that this view of its promotion they have created.

For me personally, there is no such confidence .. I do not think that is really successful in need of various bluff (IMHO) ..

[Mona]

Сообщение от LCR

I agree with Mona, speaking on contemporary authors, the success is not always in direct proportion to the artistic value of works. In the history of art is enough examples of that.
But time puts everything in its place, almost always.

Time certainly puts everything in place, but until it comes, many manage to earn on fairly low-grade jobs. People farther, the more love kitsch and beauty. I must say that most gallerists average hand traded just that. If they come across on a decent contract artist with good preparation, they "break" him under the demand. I know many such examples from life. Alas.
 However, they all loudly insist that it is a masterpiece that will be part of the century, compose stories pictures, but this does not mean that no one sees and understands the real situation