"Lyalya naked Viktor Reikhet. Who knows where she is?

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And who would buy this picture? Hang the home, "someone else's naked aunt?
Would Serov or cabin there any by the end of XIX - beg. XX vv.-another thing: the name, museum piece!
And here? One nakedness, God forgive me.

Well, yes, pouprazhnyatsya over defenseless Lyalya - why not ?
And now make an effort to sing the chorus of praise psalms Freud and Abramovich!!

[Mona]

Well-known and has already become poppy work of Freud.

Cyril Syzran
Common. Dealers arte do not work with artistic value, but with the commodity. They do not sell art, and merchandise. The word "art" "art" is used to cover up that it was easier vtyuhat. Well, as everywhere else - that the toilet paper, that the sausage that the paintings are sold by the same laws - this is an old man, Keynes overlooked.
 That's why you do not want to come to this forum, where the emphasis on the marketability of harm to the artistic quality - and it is natural and understandable. Tovar do some people, art - others. They have different interests and ideas.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Mihail

An interesting topic, a pleasure to write to Irina, Mona, thank you, I think the picture in a private Tretyakov Gallery in St. Petersburg ...
It is a pity that Kirill Syzransky not appreciate the work, but it is an undeniable masterpiece, of course, the image is not a qualitative - otdalennnoe representation gives ..

Michael! glad you. Well коменты "experts" here, eh?

About what will come of the venture with a portrait of Irina - if that will tell you. I will write to them that you agree to write a portrait. And what if there were going to negotiate their own

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mona

Dealers in arte do not work with artistic value, but with the commodity.

Right.

Сообщение от Mona

that the toilet paper, that the sausage that the paintings are sold by the same laws

Maybe I do not know about the sausage and toilet paper, and the picture is more profitable to trade.
I have something for sure.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Mona

They have different interests and ideas.

Also not sure.
There are all willing and very many, tasty ...

Added after 7 minutes
Mona, I wrote: I-dealer, is to say, the seller, a trader, "torgash2 ...
Relevant and

коменты "connoisseur"

, you calmly to this.
I now, as a cricket, I know "his last.

[Mona]

Cyril Syzransky, and you just less They reflect on the ironic or mocking tone - I almost always say so, not because it is with you. Gradually you will get used
 With decent client certainly pleasant thing to have. Who would argue?
 And why not for selling art proficiency if the result? although the success of trade from hud.tsennosti work does not depend. It is also well known that the dealer is in the wake of public tastes. And they either are or not.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mona

And you're just less They reflect on the ironic or mocking tone - I almost always say so, not because it is with you.

Well, you are applying the same to me.
And second: I'm on my slow-witted, pardonte, in your words did not see:
a) "ironic";
c) "mocking".
As, however, and you in mine.


Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Mona

the success of trade from hud.tsennosti work does not depend.

The success of the trade from the "thin. Value" depends directly.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

The success of the trade from the "thin. Value" depends directly.

Nuuu,
this, it is so the artist agreed only after they choose to buy it its

[LCR]

Сообщение от Mona

the success of trade from hud.tsennosti work does not depend

I agree with Mona, speaking on contemporary authors, the success is not always in direct proportion to the artistic value of works. In the history of art is enough examples of that.
But time puts everything in its place, almost always.

[Причал]

Сообщение от LCR

I agree with Mona, speaking on contemporary authors, the success is not always in direct proportion to the artistic value of works.

Many artists more comfortable speaking about the inverse relationship.
That is to interpret it as "if not sold - it means exactly art."

And the test of time they are interested in the least. In other words, want not valued, and prices.
That's because bad luck.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Berth

A lot of artists more comfortable speaking about the inverse relationship.
That is to interpret it as "if not sold - it means exactly art."

And the test of time they are interested in the least. In other words, want not valued, and prices.
That's because bad luck.

You are absolutely right, there is no direct relationship, or the reverse, alas (and how it would be convenient: tumbled trick, buy on the cheap is that nobody wants - after 10 years become a billionaire )

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

success is not always in direct proportion to the artistic value of works

We are talking about:

Сообщение от Mona

the success of trade

Is it possible to successfully sell the work, unable to "thin. Values"?
It seems to me, no.
Another question is about themselves "thin. Values".
Someone sees a "thin. Values" in the "lilac still lifes, and someone Give" abstract expressionism ".
But the most tasteless thing as you sell?
I do not know how to sell a naked maiden with a sword riding a tiger, for example.
Or a white Pegasus ... Krasiiiiiivo!
Although this may cause the viewer with emotion-now and thin. Value. "