A good artist - a successful artist?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Refinement read ... understood ... I will carefully ...

[Art_Lyss]

Samvel, Zenia
Of course, the artist, the dealer, so everyone watches her behavioral moments.
As for tomatoes and paintings ...
Yet in the art market is and must be specific, close to some inteligentnosti.
Yes, artists often-not a gift to their ambitions inestandartnostyu.
But the facts, I saw "type of dealers, who came on the market from the shuttle and the tavern business, and survived there all their previous chips. These were not dealers, pimps and what else. Consistent with this, they called and artists ...
What kind of trust and understanding there could be referring to?
I remember one aunt to the question of why clients in the gallery and studio artists have different prices? - With pathos, proclaimed the so-all artists-morons ...
That was long ago, but all their karma supplanted with art market and their bargaining-sites.
Here is a place for business tolerant, uvazhyuschim "art producers of goods".
Amen.

[DSF]

Zenia
... but strangely enough - almost all the great artists were men ... the art has its own logic and their favorite

Absolutely see the art and create art - these are two different processes. Therefore, Renoir said: "Not everyone can be an amateur" and "lovers, who understand the painting, still less than good painters." I think that among the lovers of big women, but among artists - more muzhchin.Po least, I personally have the same impression.

[Ninni]

Сообщение от DSF

Absolutely true see the art and create art - these are two different processes. Therefore, Renoir said: "Not everyone can be an amateur" and "lovers, who understand the painting, still less than good painters." I think that among the lovers of big women, but among artists - more muzhchin.Po least, I personally have the same impression .

I think are a little to the left .. it lies in "recent" Status of women - it was not required to choose a profession and so-much-more sacrifice.

Much thought and rammed by a lady - in fact could not be a serious artist.

Time has changed, changed and women do not know yet what will happen in the future ...

[eva777]

Roden
"Art - a beautiful lesson of sincerity. Original artist has always expressed what he thinks, is not afraid to trample on existing rules. Thus he teaches us the sincerity of his kind. Imagine what great progress we could have achieved if people were true to the end, how quickly saw the society and condemned to their mistakes, their errors, ugly business, and how quickly our land would be transformed into a paradise! "


"Passionately fond of his vocation. There is nothing more beautiful than him. It is much loftier than the average person thinks. The artist gives a great example. He is passionate about his profession: the highest award for him - the joy of creativity. Unfortunately, nowadays many despise, hate her work. But the world will be happy only when each person will be the soul of the artist, in other words, when everyone will find joy in his work. "

Filonov
"Our aim - working drawings and paintings made with all the charm of hard work, because we know that the most valuable paintings and drawings - is a powerful work of man over the thing, in which he reveals himself and his immortal soul"

[SAH]

Сообщение от Zenia

I want to put their 5 cents in the topic

Your work I liked

[DOS]

Discussion of a long, interesting, let me return to the comparative profitability of painting and drawing.
  In absolute figures, to earn a schedule as much as in painting, probably impossible, but the impact on investment schedule may be much more preferable. Imagine the collectors who bought "in its time" TV Mavrin, A. Fonvizena, A. Zverev, V. Yakovlev for "affordable" prices. Fonvizen 5-7 years ago was worth 500 dollars, now from $ 15 000 And so with many famous artists, 1950-2000 - a rise in prices on their schedule over the past 10 years - 20-40 times.
  And oil such rates can not reach. And for those individual names, who shows such growth for oil, we must bear in mind that 10 years ago to buy this oil is expensive. For example, Nemukhin. There is 50 000 dollars (before the crisis, and 70 000-80 000). I do not know exactly how much cost 10 years ago, well, let's say 2500-3000. Risky was 10 years ago to invest in it this amount, I think. Yes, and expensive for "ordinary" collector. And if the same amount to spend on kit (sorry) - 3 Zvereva, 3 Yakovlev, 1 T. Mavrina (well nearly) - almost the same effect, and no risk.
  Or the current situation. Aron Buch. Prices for oil are growing very fast (100%per annum minimum), to find something less than 10 000 dollars problematic, and graphics (with self-portraits) are still 300-400 dollars Obvkladyvyaysya!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от DOS

In absolute figures, to earn a schedule as much as in painting, probably impossible, but the impact on investment schedule may be much more preferable.

I here found an interesting grafiku.No want to consult again.
http://www.molotok.ru/item499875245_...kina_s_yu.html
I would like to know the opinion of the distinguished participants in the forum.
What do you think about this investment?

[SergeiSK]

Cyril Syzransky,
You first tell us their opinion, still red diploma art critic. And I think the description of the lot is written, everything is clear.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

What do you think about this investment?

Kirill is an investment-attribution basis, while the inscription supposedly.
(Sergei doubt he can tell).