Цитата:
Сообщение от sergejnowo
Meister, support your point of view.
Discussing /call to a particular type of investment money, not taking a while for their words /advice /recommendations of any responsibility, it is not wise. The last couple of years, many of those who invested in property, shares, securities or art progareli to the nines. Something about this and that very few people wrote. Investments often turn malopredskazuemuyu apiece. What is already forgotten as money in bank accounts frozen, and then how to received 5000 rubles (Zhiguli price at the time) with sorrow bought a Snickers? Yes these ambushes darkness. Nobody knows how and what will be the day after.
By Suteev its range of one divorce and the exact time when another burst bubble, they know only Initiation.
|
You write everything correctly. Not rezyumiruete for some reason.
The risk of investment is an inverse correlation with the ability to influence the market (or the decisions that affect the market

). The less you have such opportunities - the greater your risk. But if you compare with other players in the art market - that your position is not so weak. Art-market for the powerful is not essential, purely symbolic. MB is still, therefore, the art market - the most democratic of all the markets (as he wrote AleksandrG - the last unregulated market). Therefore, it can play a private person and frustrate
scoop. But all this is very hypothetical