Vahan Ananian (1959 - 2006)

[Glasha]

artcol, look at the second picture (portrait, after the photos)-genius.
The site, which opened, too, much like it, thanks for the friendship.
And the character and the artist no doubt.

sss, as well as to your mini-stories from the life of "the beautiful" (and a literary masterpiece)) collect in a pile-piggy bank? --
and about the artist Zohchi, and about the artist and "his" film ... and these sketches? I think it should not be lost in the bowels of the forum .. them useful and want to reread .. Admin, can make some heading something like "Notes on the cuffs? ))

[Admin]

Сообщение от Gala

Admin can make some heading something like "Notes on the cuffs"?

Gala, I do not know, think about it. Not ready skhodu reply.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Gala

artcol, look at the second picture (portrait, after the photos), a genius.

Gala to me like people are very close ... But tastes - do not argue. I agree - it is written "from itself", though noticeable effect, but where do without them ... I just like the more academic - and the whole deconstruction "postpikassovskaya" not very.

[luna]

Сообщение от artcol

Gala, people like me are very close ... But tastes - do not argue. I agree - it is written "from itself", though noticeable effect, but where do without them ... I just like the more academic - and all the Deconstruction "postpikassovskaya" not very.

Dear artcol! Deconstruction was characterized by a period of creativity opredelnennomu Vahan. Go to his website - clarity and integrity of his work last period - is obvious, and then - difficult to form an opinion about the artist, without seeing it "live".

SSS:
Thanks for the mention of Vahan and for such characteristic sketches!
As for "not engaged" - engaged in Odessa. Last year, for example, held a posthumous exhibition of Vahan, of sufficient magnitude, her works were presented virtually all periods.

[artcol]

Сообщение от luna

Dear artcol! Deconstruction was characterized by a period of creativity opredelnennomu Vahan. Go to his website - clarity and integrity of his work last period - is obvious, and then - difficult to form an opinion about the artist, without seeing it "live".

Went. The site is terrible. Liked the work "Wild Boar". All look at this site is not feasible.
"Not seeing live" - I agree, but this is only a painting, "kontemporari" (or national?). Academic can even look in b /w photos, and there all at once would be understandable.
Shl All the artists of that generation of chickenpox "Kikasso" - let us not argue about taste!
And because a good artist - will find its buyer, without a doubt.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

let us not argue about taste!

Yes, indeed, we all have different tastes.
I liked the painting here, however, as the site ...

[artcol]

Work on the site (as described later period), any comparison does not come with "kikasovskimi (early ?)... Pleasing to the eye, the formalism is almost gone, the color of the net ...
But I love more realism (where "literature") or pure experimentation (pure formalism). And all that in the middle - somehow passed. I feel kind of salon in this, "ponaroshechnost", "game".

[luna]

Сообщение от artcol

"Not seeing live" - I agree, but this is only a painting, "kontemporari" (or national?). Academic can even look in b /w photos, and everything will be immediately clear.

You can estimate qualitativeness painting on photographs, b /w-version? - Take off my hat - you are brilliant!

Any art was once "kontemporari" and rejection of the proponents of academic painting of the new directions related to the endless stories - to argue about meaningless.
Of course - "like" - "not like" - is a criterion, but very subjective.

[artcol]

Сообщение от luna

You can evaluate qualitativeness painting on photographs, b /w-version? - Take off my hat - you are brilliant!

Thank you. Previously reproductions of classics were often in black /white version, and nothing looked, and all was clear. But what "good art" enlighten?

[fross]

Сообщение от artcol

Thanks. Previously reproductions of classics were often in black /white version, and nothing looked, and all was clear. But what "good art" enlighten?

Probably similar to quality food: looked, smelled, chewed, and understood everything. But with painting just looked at the photos (but colorful!) And also understood.
But I now know what to call it that satisfied many, often drinking and fun - happening!