Photo

[noart]

Сообщение от Samvel

As determined by the value of photographs.

In the first place is if you catch the shot -))
Second, it is of course what the emotional charge it carries.
Third, it is the original photo and of course the name of the author.
It is on these criteria, collectors and amateurs photos, get photos.
Dealers and galleristy, that is another topic.
But, as everyone knows. A good dealer or gallery can sell all that you want regardless of the quality of the work. Same story with 99 cents - found Victor Mikhailovich, he is the owner of this picture)))) I think that he paid a lot - although it ... ....

[Самвел]

Сообщение от noart

First of all, is if you catch the shot -))
Second, it is of course what the emotional charge it carries.
Third, it is the original photo and of course the name of the author.

A picture can catch me, but did not catch the rest, the same can be said about the emotional impact, and originality. Here the author's name, it will help the most important. If artists can be congenital, well, without any thin education, be a good photographer, with no special education or a good teacher, I think is impossible, or am I mistaken?

[noart]

Сообщение от Samvel

picture can catch me, but did not catch the rest, the same can be said about the emotional impact, and originality. Here the author's name, it will help the most important. If artists can be congenital, well, without any thin education, be a good photographer, with no special education or a good teacher, I think is impossible, or am I mistaken?

No you're wrong here. Everyone who is better known of the photographers - have no special education. Well you can learn to shoot, but the rest is difficult to teach. So it turns out that the one who has the education - often simply a craftsman.
Take at least the same Newton where he did not study. just took off and everything.

Added after 2 minutes
PS A lot of you have seen photos, which was clinging all -))) this should not be ignored. For example Bratkov - his pictures do not do not cling to anyone - and he is and still takes - if I may say so -)))))

[Самвел]

Сообщение от noart

Take at least the same Newton where he did not study. just took off and all

If he were not Newton, these pictures were, nobody would be interesting, I think so.

[noart]

Сообщение от Samvel

If he were not Newton, these photos were, nobody would be interesting, I think so.

)))) Name, he himself made on his pictures.

[KaterinaMN]

Сообщение от Samvel

As determined by the value of photographs.

in photography - as in painting, the value of the image is determined primarily by the author's name (and here - of course - a combination of exhibitions, a presence in museums and sales - even though we have photographers that I know - no statistics), in addition - are important circulation , author \\ author does not print. source - the film \\ figure (for a modern picture) - is important but not dominant - there are techniques and the authors make a hand print from digital originals.
If you are in Moscow - there is such a wonderful man - Michael Kalamkarov (he has a blog in zhifom journal). And in St. Petersburg - Nahl Podolsky. They are both involved and the history and theory of photography, contemporary photography. And Michael - is itself a remarkable photographer.

[gans]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

is such a wonderful man - Michael Kalamkarov (he has a blog in zhifom journal)

http://kalamkarov.livejournal.com/

[KaterinaMN]

gans, exactly

[Galyona]

Сообщение от Samvel

As determined by the value of photographs.

State of mind ... a capacity purse ... but priceless pictures I think free

[noart]

Сообщение от Galyona

state of mind ... capacity of the purse ... but priceless pictures I think free

murk