Photo

[KaterinaMN]

Сообщение от Samvel

As determined by the value of photographs.

in photography - as in painting, the value of the image is determined primarily by the author's name (and here - of course - a combination of exhibitions, a presence in museums and sales - even though we have photographers that I know - no statistics), in addition - are important circulation , author \\ author does not print. source - the film \\ figure (for a modern picture) - is important but not dominant - there are techniques and the authors make a hand print from digital originals.
If you are in Moscow - there is such a wonderful man - Michael Kalamkarov (he has a blog in zhifom journal). And in St. Petersburg - Nahl Podolsky. They are both involved and the history and theory of photography, contemporary photography. And Michael - is itself a remarkable photographer.

[gans]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

is such a wonderful man - Michael Kalamkarov (he has a blog in zhifom journal)

http://kalamkarov.livejournal.com/

[KaterinaMN]

gans, exactly