Sergei Mikhailovich Romanovich (1894-1968)?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от yaks

Ramanovich it or not?

You are seriously asking?
Hope that you here so soon, looking at the photos through the monitor, someone will give a categorical answer?

[яков]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

You are seriously asking?
Hope that you here so soon, looking at the photos through the monitor, someone will give a categorical answer?

I hope that the one who is familiar with the work of this artist, advise me whether to do further research or forget about Sergei Romanovich and assume that it's just SR.A to answer categorically I did not I rely.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

yak, You know that your picture looks like a painting Romanovich.
Look at the pictures in your closet as albums. They looked the same compared.

[яков]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

yak, You know that your picture looks like a painting Romanovich.
Look at the pictures in your closet as albums. They looked the same compared. About "Wed" you know.

Sure looked and compared the course, but it works Romanovich - find AJ 4.Navernyaka who either held it in his hands, which iznaet any distinguishing characteristics of his works, on what he wrote, in what amounts, and that is apart of the ancient and biblical syuzhetov.Primeryaya given me question for themselves, can say with confidence that the majority of Kharkov padavlyayuschemu artists I could give useful information and pictures in the monitor.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от yaks

on what he wrote

Many paper. Like your picture, as far as I see it. You do not give any technique, no size ...
It looked?
http://maakovets.narod.ru/galzhiv.htm

[яков]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Many of the paper. As for your picture, as far as I see it. You do not give any technique, no size ...
It looked?
http://maakovets.narod.ru/galzhiv.htm

Thank you! very good site, I for some reason it does not popadal.Poydu analyze.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Tjutchev

yak, landscapes Sergei Mikhailovich not very much. I think your picture, at least, deserves serious consideration. Every other day - two I'll give you more or less definitive answer. There must be some work, after which something is cleared up ...

Thank you for your participation! I would highly doubt you priznatelen.Ya very far from understanding the painting Romanovicha.Foto now you vyshlyu.S.uv.Yakov.

[Игорь Гурьев]

At Romanovich, of course, it seems, but certainly nothing can be said.

[Тютчев]

yak, this picture is not the work Romanovich SM. I have a stronger claim to it.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от yaks, 831,151

, I hope that the one who is familiar with the work of this artist, advise me whether to do further research or forget about Sergei Romanovich and assume that it's just SR.A to answer categorically I did not I rely.

yak, landscapes Sergei Mikhailovich not very much. I think your picture, at least, deserves serious consideration. Every other day - two I'll give you more or less definitive answer. There must be some work, after which something becomes clearer ...