Andy Warhol, silkscreen "Mao"

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Seriy

Vladimir, I recently stumbled on your and other people's reviews of investment in sovrisk in the early 2000's in the journal "Director" (? Possibly wrong with the called). Prices as from another planet. American abstraktekspressionisty first row of ten thousand dollars.

Yes, then in "The Director-info" was the heading "Investing in Art" and a series of articles about investing in direction. I do not know what kind of review you caught. But then there were still a rarity: and Harring and Basquiat, and Kondo. But since then much water has flowed under the bridge. Basquiat has risen in price again at 8. For all the first names have statistics - this market is very underdeveloped.

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Eugene

Volodya facts tell a different story ... Here's the events that have occurred after the record sales (2006.)

In the year sold at auction hundreds of works by Warhol. And only very few are sold for tens of millions. Can only compare the same sales of comparable quality things (with Warhol is not difficult). What are we arguing? Can I sell to Mao, which was bought for 17 million three years ago today that 34 million? Or 50? Theoretically possible. If someone strongly feel an urge. But it will not be an investment decision, and emotional. A wise Chinese man sit by the river to wait for when his pripyvet other "Mao"