CHA News

[Sandro]

Cyril Syzransky, I do not understand what have CHA? At the expense of "GTG-Arts & Humanities twentieth century, this is understandable, and think not to worry about anything, they certainly give a space before the opening of the new building.
But CHA - tightly corrupt organization, in my opinion to the needs of real artists nothing to do with not having a long time! Thank God they (the Union of Artists) remains the full area around Moscow, the kotoryht they can put out to divine the previous terms.
As for the open-air market on the waterfront (point someone in distress) because it prevents those who remain? He, too, IMHO the current building CHA is not connected.

[DimaB]

As I said, the leadership of CHA (I'm talking about the Director of CHA and in combination on the master leases it company Expo-Park, Vasily Bychkov), now completely calm. Confidently say that the new building houses the artist will be built, no one knows when, but it is not important. And only then will move. I think they know more than us, so the experience is for them.
Although they are still against the change. To the question: why? - If the building is modern and finally technically adapted to the exhibition activities - no answer. All speak of the "namolennosti" this place. Technical equipment in these ethical parameters does not fit ...

[OTROK NIKODIM]

Sandro,
Why break. We must build a new and not necessarily on the Crimean Val. Location, I guess you can find. Another question is whether this new place is as attractive to investors as CHA? It seems that when making strategic decisions on such an object, as CHA (should be separated by the federal and private owners) about the interests of artists and others of that ilk think the very least. Convenient to use the demolition of old buildings to a new and very profitably equip its former space. Personal financial gain or the prospect - the only thing standing in decisions on such objects. This building would have removed long ago. Saved him only what the owners are different, and investors have shown explainable indecision. People inside really is not enough. There were times better, but it is not connected with the building itself, but with the uncertainty of the fate of the spirit which hovers in space and pervades all their perishable influence. My opinion - the building is not broken, rebuild the modern fashion, the owners do not touch. Go tell that personal interests in the administration do not have. I assume that is subjective in the evaluation, because once had a relationship to this building and of course, in civil, not indifferent to his fate.

[DimaB]

That is what is officially sent organizers of the rally in defense of CHA (20.12). If you have the strength - read to the end. Mestamismeshno.

on December 20 at 15.45 at the door at the entrance to Gorky Park Gorky was a rally against the demolition of CHA and against the adoption of the General Plan. The organizers of the protest action were made by the activists' right to the city "and the socialist movement" Forward ". Despite the frost, the square opposite the Central House of Artists express their disagreement with the General Plan-2025 it was about 200 people.

The rally was held under the slogans against the General Plan and against the demolition of buildings CHA /GTG and commercial construction in its place - "Master Plan-2025 - is genocide Muscovites", "The wealth of Russia's culture, rather than building up an elite," "Stop the unknown investor" "Russian avant-garde is no place on the margins of the business center."

All speakers agreed on the fact that the adoption on December 22 the key document that determines the construction of Moscow until 2025, offers tremendous opportunities for new crimes against the appearance of our city and the interests of its residents. Numerous violations of the law, flaws, lies and falsification accompanying the adoption of General Plan talk about one thing: he was adopted solely for the benefit of corrupt officials and big business. Every resident of Moscow becomes a nuisance in the way of this "master plan" of bureaucrats and construction business: the transformation of the whole (parks and courtyards, museums and architectural monuments, buildings and roads) in profit.

The main claim made at the event: decisions relating to all, should not take a miserable bunch. Discuss and create a space habitat have all the townspeople. Adoption of the General Plan should be suspended, its development involved independent businesses experts view the public should be taken into account, in fact, not in words, there should be a retrial, which would identify, took into account whether the requirements of the townspeople.

Also at the rally was shown a satirical New Year's performance of "False" Santa Claus give away investors Moscow. "Jura boy in a cap read Grandfather Frost and Snow Maiden, general layout poem Eugene Yassin" New Moscow "(http://elesin.livejournal.com/825476.html), and the girl, Lena, his girlfriend, gave Santa Claus orange ball with the words "I took an orange clay and blinded, walked to the reception, got a house." They got a gift, CHA, tied with pink ribbon. There were no New Year Kush and Turkish boy Gunay Insaat Sanayi Ve Ticaret Sirketi Anonymous - he won the Pushkin Square (http://www.izvestia.ru/moscow/article3095055/), and the second national wealth behalf of the great poet, Pushkin Museum im. Pushkin, produced a small, Lord Norman (http://www.archnadzor.ru/?p=3306).

Gift Norman Santa Claus accompanied the reading of "disposal", the text of which corresponded to a poem by Marina Tsvetaeva "From my hands - city not made //Accept, my strange, my beautiful brother." Process razdarivaniya Moscow stopped the boy Moskvich, torn from his festive Santa Claus mask, under which the mask revealed terrorist. He told everyone that Santa Claus - a fake, and encouraged all along to call the present, which will return to Moscow citizens.

[ФАИв]

Сообщение от Sandro

Cyril Syzransky, I do not understand what have CHA? At the expense of "GTG-Arts & Humanities twentieth century, this is understandable, and think not to worry about anything, they certainly give a space before the opening of the new building.
But CHA - tightly corrupt organization, in my opinion to the needs of real artists nothing to do with not having a long time! Thank God they (the Union of Artists) remains the full area around Moscow, the kotoryht they can put out to divine the previous terms.

Well, with this and begin the orgy of legal nihilism! CHA corrupt or not, but 40%of the area does not belong to the state. GTG, and therefore the state owns only 60%of the building. to decide the fate of these areas without taking into account the views of the rightful owners, until proven otherwise - this is IMHO a crime.
I believe that the large and comfortable at the location of such areas in the property from the Non-governmental organizations in Moscow to show no more. A non Fikshen? And salons? Where all this be?
Yes - someone building CHA may not like it, but let's not forget that this is probably the last example of such an architecture in Moscow, and in my humble opinion, it ought to modernize and maintain its appearance.
Well, enough already "Baturin" Khapaev all in the city center and redraw on your taste. And so from Moscow almost nothing left. And this Moloch eats and eats everything!.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от FAIv

Well, enough already "Baturin" Khapaev all in the city center and redraw on your taste. And so from Moscow almost nothing left. And this Moloch eats and eats everything!.

Excellent words!
Try to tell them in the transfer of "Facing the city, where usually Luzhkov answering questions viewers. Luzhkov, an experienced politician, let's see what he will answer.
I foresee a counter-question and answer right away: very strong wind blowing.

[VArt]

Reconstructed NOT REPAIR !

[Самвел]

Сообщение от dedulya37

program "Face-to-city",

More than hypocritical transmission I have never met, but looking at the lead, comes into my mind only one thought. (As a low fallen man.)

[komend]

In the 95th year of life, died renowned architect Nicholas Sukoyan - http://echo.msk.ru/news/644500-echo.html

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Par-I

According to the promulgated earlier draft of the new lay-quarter on the Crimean shaft, a building for the Tretyakov Gallery will be located at the Garden ring.

Interestingly, and where is it? Garden Ring, Muscovites know, built on a very tight and mostly historical monuments. What else is demolished to satisfy the urge of power?
Grandpa!
I'm afraid to ask questions "expensive transfer Face-to-city" is meaningless because it will take something together, but as they say, "after us even though the grass, even though" oranges "does not rise "....
And in general, I wonder what this project was made public?