Charles Saatchi: Sharks are good, and feces artists - too

[ikoku]

Cyril Syzransky
What is air?
This is serious Investment Areas.

Maybe so, but just about the dispute. Will-I value these products grow in the future?
As you know the sad history of financial pyramids, they collapse.

Me as an artist it seems fantasmogoriey. H-P to date, the value of my works $ 8 000 - $ 15 000.
I admit that when !!!!!, literacy and work on my part and from the gallery owners, art dealers and others over many years could raise the price of the order. And that to me is clear and understandable, did not bother and do not worry. But if Mr. Saatchi will display my works, then maybe the price will be space. It is a concern, because something that you create, mixed with emptiness. It's just that agree to accept the proposal to make of her child suddenly Hollywood star. The child is hurt (a child, I mean the creation of the artist).
I shall be very glad if you dispel my "fears"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ikoku

will be-whether the value of these products to grow in the future?

There are examples where expensive works of art have fallen in price? Can you give such examples?
Irises and Sunflowers paid 10 times cheaper than purchased?

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от ikoku

we all know the sad history of financial pyramids, they collapse.

"Pyramid" in quotation marks. In Egypt there are thousands of years ...

[ikoku]

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

There are examples where expensive works of art have fallen in price? Can you give such examples?
Irises and Sunflowers paid 10 times cheaper than purchased?

Added after 1 minute

"Pyramid" in quotation marks. In Egypt there are thousands of years ...

Yes, only the real pyramids in Egypt, and the financial collapse, you know examples.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

There are examples where expensive works of art have fallen in price? Can you give such examples?
Irises and Sunflowers paid 10 times cheaper than purchased?

Of course there is, Kirill - Fortuny, Meissonier, Gerome, and in general, all the French salon of the XIX century, and even Monticelli, which was very expensive, but now a few tens of thousands of dollars can buy a magnificent origin - from one of the most magnificent museums in the world. We ought to check, but I think that Daumier and Courbet also in constant francs were more expensive than now.

Renoir, Utrillo, Kisling, Buffet, Mathieu - lists of those who come to mind - have fallen significantly in price.
Prices Marie Laurence were compared with 1980-90. halved (note, I'm not saying that it is as an artist at all worth something) ...

From the very modern, some Italians and Americans (Kia, Schnabel), included in vogue in the 1980's. also sold cheaper than before. I will not mention the names of some Russian artists

That is, it seems that with the development of the art market and the beginning of the investment purchase of works of art such things were perfectly normal.

[kozhinart]

Everything comes to its relativity, nothing is forever ...
Price shocks reflect trends in the market, supported by certain players ...

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от LCR

I will not mention the names of some Russian artists

Why? I would very much like you to mention them ... Who are these artists?

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от kozhinart

All reaches its relativity, nothing is forever ...

Real art - forever! ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Volga flows into the Caspian Sea ... Horses eat oats and hay ... (c)

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

Renoir, Utrillo, Kisling, Buffet, Mathieu - lists of those who come to mind - have fallen significantly in price.

It is interesting, I'd look and compare ...

[kozhinart]

The present art - forever !...

In a global sense, yes ... But for some categories of use is difficult, painting, book, even if properly stored as live? ... The idea of the picture forever ... although it is debatable ... I do not want to argue with you, I simply l think ...

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от kozhinart

In a global sense, yes ... But for some categories of use is difficult, painting, book, even if properly stored as live? ... The idea of the picture forever ... although it is debatable ... I do not want to argue with you, I simply l think ...

I had in mind an art, and not a painting or a book as an object ... Art - as the highest achievement of mankind, as a manifestation of the unique abilities of the individual artist in the reflection of something incomprehensible (you can say or Divine Omnipresent) ... This art has no value because it is unique and has enormous power to influence people ... But I'm talking about real art, not about the art of selling! Although it is also art in its own way ...

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

I had in mind an art, and not a painting or a book as an object ... Art - as the highest achievement of mankind, as a manifestation of the unique abilities of the individual artist in the reflection of something incomprehensible (you can tell Divine or Omnipresent) ... This art has no value because it is unique and has enormous power to influence people ... But I'm talking about real art, not about the art of selling! Although it is also art in its own way ...

I wrote about the idea of an ideal, it vechno.Absolyut not achievable, but many do not potyaten. People are different ...
And what of the atheists, they were not enough, and people with a different consciousness and morovozreniem? Concept of the uniqueness of human capabilities is very blurry, everyone is different .. Just as the definition of the divine origin of the gift of a divine hudozhnika.A this gift as defined? What criteria?