Photo exhibition with lots Sotheby's

[Meister]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Because талантище And the work is interesting

  1, what a gorgeous Magritte! with boundless imagination was chelovechische ... That's his work, as indeed the creation of Tangi and Delvaux, you can admire the clock. they are so fascinating that it seems that you are in a different reality. Magritte knew how to combine the real with the surreal. In most of the work at first glance it seems that there is nothing special, and then look around and mentally likuesh of awareness of the artist's ideas. For this, and I love the surrealists - it's their work simply can not waft boredom ...

And Van Gogh, Munch, Kandinsky, and should be fantastic)) Run to watch today))

P.S. Yesterday was the pre-auction showing at Christies. Contrary to expectations, the strong things a little - Goncharova, Brueghel, and loosely Renoir .. Kandinsky was a bit of work, created in the transition to abstraction, so the estimate of 15-20 million is surprising. A similar situation with the works of Monet, who in the picture looks much better than live. About modern art, I generally keep quiet)) Why is the work of Bacon (for which I am very well) should be worth the 40 Brueghel (s) can not understand at all)) Well it's not logical)))

[Konstantin]

From Magritte feel strange. I agree that at first glance like anything special. No riot of colors. But next to him as you find yourself in cotton wool, the space of just thickens and somehow glohnesh. There was an interesting scene. Just a TV channel did a report, and the camera guy was leading against the backdrop of Magritte tried to say some words. Three consecutive attempts, he began to speak and stammering, heatedly rebuked the operator that he did not have time to run over and do something else. Then he got tired and left the camera and then walked away like smoke. Then I have another picture of them saw it kind of went ahead.

[Tamila]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Munch "Vampire" - $ 30-40 million - a devilishly handsome and attractive. But at home to hang - God forbid. They just go out at night and wander out of the picture in search of victims.

Incidentally the name of something, not the artist originally painted vampire. While looks and damned true.
"Actually, Edvard Munch himself described the painting simply as a picture redheaded woman kissing her lover in the neck, and the original title of the painting -" Love and Pain. "Association with the vampires came from one art critic who saw it on the show (he must have attentively read the novel by Bram Stoker's Dracula - vampires bite victim in the jugular vein, and not in the cervical spine). However, the name is firmly stuck to the picture "
Tatiana Markina article in Kommersant Weekend
http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID...amp;print=true

[fross]

On top lots can still watch the video http://www.sothebys.com/video/privat...485/index.html