How to unleash the artist

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от artcol

There is a book "Investing in Art" (the name can not remember exactly, sponsored the Deutsche Bank), there was an attempt to bring the scientific basis for this case. Read - there all chewed.

Sergei Skaterschikova book, which attempts to Formula analysis of investment in art. I read. It is useful to the general point of view. But IMHO, many things are far-fetched, subjective time is not taken into account, a mathematician. Audience - brokers and white-collar workers, who had heard that in the art can be cool to invest. Here is the book http://www.skatepress.com/, released only in Russian.

[color="# 666686"]Added a 42 seconds[/color]

Сообщение от artcol

There is only one correct way to choose the artist (in terms of investment) - assessment of its contribution to the history of art. This is in spite of subjectivity - the most objective criterion of objectivity that recognizes the broadest possible range PROFESSIONALS, not involved in the art business (art historians, critics, etc.).

But with this statement completely agree.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

It is useful to the general point of view.

That's it.

Сообщение от Vladimir

But IMHO, many things are far-fetched, subjective time is not taken into account, a mathematician.

But do not agree. There another context, a different perspective.
We are here with you that investing argue, but a book about how to invest (wisely) and attempt to identify indicators.
The authors operate with works valued at between 1 million and above (foreign currency). And there is a subjective element. It's called "collector's interest," that I ...
In fact, it is of course OS and the author of its structure, but the basic things they cast well.

I have a way to cover the other was if the book is the same. In the dark blue.
Here it is: http://www.alpina.ru/book/308
like the same.

[LCR]

Сообщение от artcol

There is only one correct way to choose the artist (in terms of investment) - assessment of its contribution to the history of art. This is in spite of subjectivity - the most objective criterion of objectivity that recognizes the broadest possible range PROFESSIONALS, not involved in the art business (art historians, critics, etc.).

Theoretically, this should be so. The problem is that a) I think Russia has the largest gap between professionals and consumers who simply are unaware of their existence, and b) professionals, idle in the art business, there is less and less - and here I speak not only of Russia, a large number of articles, which I translated for this forum, states that the situation in the West.

[iosif]

LCR,
as the saying goes, "what we all think but are afraid to say"

[artcol]

Сообщение от LCR

Theoretically, this should be so. The problem is that a) I think Russia has the largest gap between professionals and consumers who simply are unaware of their existence, and b) professionals, idle in the art business, there is less and less - and here I speak not only of Russia, a large number of articles, which I translated for this forum, states that the situation in the West.

Add:
even among professionals and blinkers mb - personal biases /antagonism, relationships, etc.
But this is the problem of buyers.
With an increase in appetite and the level of collection dr.variantov no.

[iosif]

sss,
Thank you for your opinion, for me it's important.
Special thanks for assistance in the promotion of the brand iosif

[Евгений]

Сообщение от LCR

professionals, idle in the art business, there are fewer

I agree, they are not left ...

[LCR]

Сообщение от artcol

add:
even among professionals and blinkers mb - personal biases /antagonism, relationships, etc.
But this is the problem of buyers.

There is not only personal preferences, but some general setting, and it becomes a problem not only buyers.
Give very specific example. Two years ago, I arranged an exhibition of works of my husband in a Paris gallery - not the last, even if lately it is not as active as before. It was a shortened version of the exhibition, held at the NCCA in 2005 at the first Biennale, and received excellent press.

On opening day there were many specialized journalists, I was surprised and happy (there are galleries, which critics never go, in fact, these galleries is just the majority), and most importantly, I saw that they really like it, honestly.

Home I left happy and waited. All week, bought newspapers - nothing. I called galereyschitse, said she did not understand, because they liked what she had said that there was nothing unusual in this, "they'll never write about has not yet advanced artists, where they saw for the first time."
As you can see, a vicious circle
So, the question arises is: how the public can generally know about the artist?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от LCR

as the general public can learn about the artist

Pay every journalist liter of good cognac .., but simply to chance the naive ..

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от artcol

I have a way to cover the other was, if the book is the same. In the dark blue.
Here it is: http://www.alpina.ru/book/308
like the same.

Yes, this is it. Only in the jacket. And under it - just blue.