Job A. Exter?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alenka

Sold in 2005 in Berlin.

Pity the buyer.

[Alenka]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

sorry for the buyer.
Although that regret something ...

Do you think that the 2nd picture is also not Exter. I mean this one.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alenka

Do you think that the 2nd picture is also not Exter.

I think that so many of the math.

[redbor]

So who can definitely attribution of A. Exter?
Why Kovalenko, always regarded as the main expert on Exter, fell under suspicion? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. This intrigues.
I have, they podisannaya attribution Exter. Do not pass?
Must carry on a new one? To where?
In the State Tretyakov Gallery, Waqar and Mihnenko yet listed?

[tivoli]

Exter NOT! On this issue, you may consult Professor Dmitry Yemelianovich Gorbachev.

[Alenka]

Сообщение от redbor

So who can definitely attribution of A. Exter?
Why Kovalenko, always regarded as the main expert on Exter, fell under suspicion? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. This intrigues.
I have, they podisannaya attribution Exter. Do not pass?
Must carry on a new one? To where?
In the State Tretyakov Gallery, Waqar and Mihnenko yet listed?

In this case, at Exeter in general very similar, plus sizes, and, as I said before, I'm not haunted by the question "Why do the costume sketch of this size but also in oil on canvas ???", and expertise Kovalenko only just adds fuel to the fire. Somewhere on this forum has been lecturing about the authenticity of examinations Kovalenko and just noticed it was true that the examination of recent years caused rumors. So if your expertise "with the term of limitation " then, I suppose, and not to worry. Otherwise, better perebdet than nedobdet .....

[redbor]

Сообщение от Alenka

Somewhere on this forum has been lecturing about the authenticity of examinations Kovalenko and just noticed it was true that the examination of recent years caused rumors

All the same it is not clear that such rumors?
  Expertise G. Konovalenko been refuted by the results of other examinations?
Or simply someone vyskazyvat offense?
My expertise GA Konovalenko is, sure - is correct.
 But for other works Exter (I think)
 Who better to ask, so that no misunderstanding?

I do not give rest to the question "Why do the costume sketch of this size but also oil on canvas ???"

But it is much more absurd, to make a fake costume sketches "of this size but also oil on canvas "

[redbor]

And it - oil on canvas, size 1metr at 0,7 m, the work of Exter?

[eva777]

Сообщение от redbor

I have expertise GA Konovalenko there, sure - correct.

Kovalenko, or Konovalenko?

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

So who can definitely attribution of A. Exter?
Why Kovalenko, always regarded as the main expert on Exter, fell under suspicion? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. This intrigues.
I have, they podisannaya attribution Exter. Do not pass?
Must carry on a new one? To where?
In the State Tretyakov Gallery, Waqar and Mihnenko yet listed?

listed as Kovalenko!

[redbor]

Kovalenko, or Konovalenko?

Of course, Kovalenko. I think that he is the best specialist in Exter. It is not clear that the "rumors" that are constantly referred to?
His expertise had been refuted by other experts?