|
|||||||
| Costs, valuation, attribution Discuss artworks’ prices and attribution. |
![]() |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #2 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 10.08.2008
Адрес: Russia, $ochi
Сообщений: 5,666
Спасибо: 1,397
Поблагодарили 6,209 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 9995
|
I want to raise this subject because have a reason and the questions I have almost the same as that of uriart. In general, all telling you, even a little Provenance
Today, bought from an elderly Jewish couple, the picture Andrei Schilder. What kind of artist they do not know, the picture hung next to paintings by European artists. Nine or ten paintings in this family, they now sell them all. But Russian artist, I found only one, this Schilder. Interestingly, the owners thought it was a foreign artist. According to them, all these pictures they passed by inheritance from their parents and they from their parents. Family itself before the war lived in Moscow and in about 1939-40 GG moved to Sochi, as their grandfather was a renowned civil engineer and he was sent to construction sites sanatoriums in the city of Sochi. Paintings collected exactly grandfather, they said he gave them private. Time seized Schilder thoroughly I was not. He hastily looked around a dozen of his pictures on the Internet, compared the signature on the catalog. Well bought, because about their "sale" has already learned various "bugs" and if not me, then someone else had bought the picture. This oil on canvas, 90x60 cm, 1897. Canvas old craquelure, under subframe pile of dust and dirt. Nails old, without a cap. Houses shone in the UV-rays - no lights, no restoration. Signed sort of wet. Paints petrified. I am ashamed to say, but I the paint layer before buying brand-poprotykal But not very much: D Rama was old with crumbling stucco, restoration, at least in Sochi, not compensable. I already had it in another frame wear. And natural mistrust began to torment - and Schilder it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #3 |
|
Старожил
Регистрация: 22.07.2008
Адрес: Урал.Национальный парк "Зюраткуль"
Сообщений: 597
Спасибо: 371
Поблагодарили 493 раз(а) в 180 сообщениях
Репутация: 540
|
However, how many "Schilder" broke out overnight ...
|
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо antip за это полезное сообщение: | SergeiSK (29.08.2008) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #4 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,439
Спасибо: 27,871
Поблагодарили 55,339 раз(а) в 24,289 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102399
|
SergeiSK, but for me, so landscape URIARTa more "Schilder" than yours.
Slicked landscapes he had, but certainly in 1897g.on already wrote famously, and quite svobodno.Est "hooliganism" quotes from the fashionable French. While-can in order and so wrote? But some static, without movement ... Maybe because of the monitor to see? In Givet a 60x90-hoo! Certainly beautiful? "I do not know ... And zakatets (rassvetets) modest a timid ... It Babakhan eyes hurt sometimes because of the color! |
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #6 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,439
Спасибо: 27,871
Поблагодарили 55,339 раз(а) в 24,289 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102399
|
antip, things alla prima, a time not written.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 45 minutes[/color] SergeiSK, although the water, I must admit, I ego.Navernoe hot-now-look at a few moments-it 100%. This is in pieces and smash everything in zhilu.A now the whole look-more like . Exclude themselves from the monitor to discuss the painting ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #7 |
|
Banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #8 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 10.08.2008
Адрес: Russia, $ochi
Сообщений: 5,666
Спасибо: 1,397
Поблагодарили 6,209 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 9995
|
uriart,
I watched this catalog before purchasing the painting. Plus, even found a few works. But getting this work comes not from their own knowledge of the Schilder, who is not too much, but from the situation the fact of purchase - the identity of the sellers, their history, their name. I even showed family archive. And of course from their own experiences, and other less visible at first glance factors. In the fall take her to Moscow for examination. And in general, it must be "live" picture of the watch. In reality, it is better and somehow more profound than in the photo. Yes photographer from me useless. If my picture professionally photographed, then it will look exactly like in this directory. |
|
|
|