Relationship and mutual obligations between the artist and gallery owners

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от DSF

Unfortunately, the Soviet system has fostered a special type of artist. On the one hand the artist used to receive from the state apartments, shops, jobs, money, honor and awards. For this he had to carry out the social order, distribution and fate of his works are not worried about the artist. On the other hand, to obtain these benefits, it was necessary to break through to a manger, because wealth was not enough. To do this, I had driven away the competition. I have found these gatherings the night before the next election meetings, which we called "the headquarters of October, and which were discussed in detail plans for the expulsion of their colleagues with grain beds. All election technology used today, is long been known for our artists. This is an ignorant generation that is accustomed to take unceremoniously, stifle capable deprived of Culture. As a result, when the state withdrew itself from the art, these artists looked back and saw: Oh, gallery! And they apply to this gallery, as to the state: we have your pictures, you give us all the benefits free. And competitors - to choke, out of habit. And if the gallery fails, then gallery owners - a dealer and a swindler. But the gallery - not the state, the scale of the problem and not the others. To understand this and build the right relationships - need culture. And it is not.
      Sometimes I am so sorry our gallery owners, with whom they have to deal ... It must have nerves of steel. And what are the different local bottling "Van Gog"? In Samara them only in my memory there were three pieces. And all - genius, and all - millions of Give.

I do not agree with your assessment and feature artists of the "Soviet" period. But the State was not indifferent to what will people do who are educated (not like the current quality) for his schet.I do not forget about the totalitarian nature of the gosudarstva.Pri all its limitations and stupidity, this state understood what effect art has on the current cheloveka.A now employs only himself.
  Cultural heritage "of the ignorant generation that is accustomed to take unceremoniously, stifle capable deprived of Culture" is the basis of many museum and private collections. With respect to rank, wealth and preferences, then, strangely, their nor-not canceled today, they bought most bestydnym way for those same officials from the "control of the culture." And in Soviet times were the artists do not care about all this tinsel for the sake of creative independence, but now I personally do not watch these.
  Regards galerey.Hudozhnik creates not for them. They - posrednik.Esli mediator clever and in control of their appetites, so he arrived and always vostrebovan.V any business.
With creative Samara artists znakom.Ne Could you clarify - of whom it is your unsympathetic statement.