27 Antique Salon

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от observer

to the left, too, 1913, and the right - 1915.
One can only sympathize with the buyer and congratulate "collector", who managed to get rid of this third-painting.

Do you think that the picture in the center worse than that on the side?

I would really like to understand what kind of work do you think first-class?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

gallery Argos Antique

Like the gallery.
Later show any pictures from the compartment (now really forces do not mess around with a camera and even get up early- must meet the train tomorrow Kiev, in 6.39 !!!: eek -and stands, and the person recognizable.

And about this gallery write popodrobneee-interesting to me she was interested in-argoss.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]
You should not have scared me, Konstantin, there was no picture, where would I refused to shoot, but I have pictures on the forehead not be photographed, and release them to look at avenues of gallery, in booklets ...
But the atmosphere seemed to pass me a more interesting picture in the context of the stand, so to speak, galleries, etc. ...
Well, look then, thanks, he has not looked all that nasnimal ... : D: D: D

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

The fact that the meter works just Grigorieva and cost several million dollar:

To be honest, I did not orentiruyus, at Sotheby's and Christie's, but what of the Grigoryev, at Sovkome, let graphics ,6000-7000 $, and this in 2007, no crisis is no question.

[observer]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Do you think that the picture in the center worse than that on the sides?

What to ask rhetorical questions and relay others' texts, share best if you are a person close to the emperor, the secrets of the interior.

Why, for example, to pull for this event are selling items?

And a boy? Maybe the boy then, does not it?
Who saw this saving the buyer? But later, trading in these thing, you can refer to this event and the amount to justify the price.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от observer

For the first time I see such a weak, helpless Grigorieva work. The artist himself, probably would be horrified to see her on the stand of this gallery.

For the first time I see such a weak, helpless statement. You are actually signs of not understanding the subject, but even so categorically ...

[observer]

It seems, got sick on the corn. This is not yours, the case, the picture?

Answer in the spirit himself a fool proof for that.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от observer

For the first time I see ...

You forgot to add: on sale in Russia ...

Since the work Grigorieva Russian period in general is extremely low, even in museums, but much work replicated the previous cycle, "scat" - almost did not survive, I also think a big luck to see her, before that, mostly accounted for only read about it .. . Even reproductions - on the fingers of countless.

Example Gleb Pospelov:
In the first half and middle of the 1910 - even before turning to the topic of Russia - Grigory actively mastered the genre of "theatrical pictures", created by craftsmen from the World of Art, Sapunov, Sudeikin etc. As already mentioned, theatrical sketches increasingly turned to those years of preparatory to an independent kind of easel painting, a special kind of story works, which differ from the usual genre that became a place of theater scene, with its scenery, the backdrop and the figures of the actors. Like Sudeikina, Grigor'ev sinister characters - vagabonds, idlers, visitors questionable sites - always carnival mask in the corresponding colored outfits, and the surrounding cardboard trees or pergolas - always frank painted props.
... Pictures from Grigor'ev revelers coarser and more prosaic, their paint is faded, it is cold - colorful, and most importantly, they disappeared a longing for the sublime ... Playing the underside of the theatrical environment, Grigoriev did not rise above its pernicious breath. He seemed to like his "silly" characters, dressed in "peacock feathers" of carnival costumes, leading mocking dances ...
Grigoryev long remained faithful to this type of painting.

By the way, at the Salon could see (can not remember who), two Grigoryevs Chilean period - not very expensive. But do not compare!

[Meister]

Сообщение от observer

One can only sympathize with the buyer and congratulate "collector", who managed to get rid of this third-painting.

sympathize with you and want to Samvel, because we have to weigh every word when you talk out loud about these works is Grigoryeva, Falk, Shterenberg ... I remember at one exhibition Impressionists someone poured out loud with the words like a connoisseur-class landscape, Van Gogh, that it looked about the same - in the best case with sympathy ...

[fross]

Сообщение от observer

It seems, got sick on the corn. This is not yours, the case, the picture?
Answer in the spirit himself to fool proof.

Strange and very prolonged reaction to this work. Or do you judge about her in the photo (by the way is very unfortunate), which is indirectly confirmed by the lack of comments on two really poor work by the same author from a different stand, or it's something personal. I hasten to put to rest any suspicions about my involvement with the seller Gallery, the buyer, and even a special love for the author does not cherish.

[Самвел]

So the auction house Sotheby's, brings two days of Boris Grigoriev. a salon is just a preliminary bombardment, for these two.