This is a copy of the work of the artist?

[allexx]

Originally Posted by redbor

I in the sense that the 10 differences found could not.
If anyone could, please let. tells

Hmm .. I thought you were the opposite - found more than 10 differences for me that's what things are obvious:

First, the portrait, which is supposed copy, not "breathe" ... if you look at reproductions, hair, girls are free, almost undulating, well, in general, very airy, something it. And on the alleged copies are some clotted, filthy. Compared with the original, ie, the engraving, of course And the light falls on the person of course in the original and a copy of the alleged spot any. And flat copy of some sort ... Paint faded. I am not an expert, not art, it is my subjective feelings simply.

[Buscador]

Originally Posted by allexx

the alleged copy,

Why did you decide that this is a copy? As far as I know, all accompanied by a copy of the relevant inscription on the back or front side. If there is, and the author's signature - means it is either the original, lio fake (but not a copy). By computer, of course, impossible to determine this. And why do you reject the author's version of the repeat (for families). It is necessary to have before our eyes the work itself, to know the author, an analysis of the paint layer ...

[наследник]

allexx, there is one difference ... I have already written - the level of skill.
  A skill is not in differences in the details. (See post 21)
Waiting for photos, wrote what.

[Buscador]

With an increase in photo found some strange band going smoothly under the signature and over it ... Tomorrow'll talk about it with spices

[allexx]

Originally Posted by heir

allexx
Waiting for photos, wrote what.

It turned out I want a normal macro prints to

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Originally Posted by Buscador

Why did you decide that this is a copy? If there is, and the author's signature - means it is either the original, lio fake (but not a copy). And why do you reject the author's version of the repeat (for families). It is necessary to have before our eyes the work itself, to know the author, an analysis of the paint layer ...

On the author replays, I thought, but given the presence of another work (not sold at auction in 2000) on the tree and for some reason, printed in the directory mirror ... it is unlikely. Incidentally, I wrote on this auction, requested details of any list, contact the owner, came the laconic reply "this is impossible, sorry."

Heir wrote about the level of skill, in principle, it is true ... I can not explain why, but I just had the feeling that the author did not write the original.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Originally Posted by heir

allexx, there is one difference ... I have already written - the level of skill.
  A skill is not in differences in the details. (See post 21)

And if the level of skill, not you tell what exactly it is expressed? I really do not dock in the painting are geared to their feelings, but I believe that the notion of "skill level" can be on shelves disintegrate. The example of these two works, shall we say?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 16 minutes[/color]
But even though oil, or The Draw products, painted or engraved oleograph? I was plagued by vague doubts ... My father's house is old, another 30-s print of "Turk" Briullov on oil is very pohozhe.A?

[наследник]

Originally Posted by allexx

And if the level of skill, not tell whether what exactly it is expressed?

allexx, better and, most importantly, understandable hardly explain to you. Read!
First, the portrait, which is supposed copy, not "breathe" ... if you look at reproductions, hair, girls are free, almost heaving, well, in general, very airy, something it. And on the alleged copies are some clotted, filthy. Compared with the original, ie, engraving, of course And the light on a person falls naturally in the original, but on the alleged copy of the spot any. And flat copy of some sort ... Paint faded. And then I may add that the air makes one's hair a smear ... know, like in the movies shown? - The master is coming to an apprentice, takes a brush and ... in the eyes of the portrait of the mind appeared. And there were before the eyes of pop-eyed
And do not master the rules of the eyes - a wrinkle spent ....
This ability to differentiate you have, do not shy.
  And the fact that some on this forum "Having seen" more than others - so it can be acquired. The main thing is that the eye is not "zamylivalsya!
(Thank you, what you remember about my request)

[redbor]

Originally Posted by allexx

... without a photo, find the following:
"After F Schauss - Pair of Oleographs -" Hansel "and" Gretel "-

This is a normal couple - a brother and sister from a fairy tale.
  Here it is, this Gantsel work Schaussa.

[наследник]

Originally Posted by redbor

brother and sister out of a fairy tale.

Kai and Gerda?

[dimurus]

Originally Posted by allexx

Is not sold a portrait of all lottery products, such as oleograph

  nature of the wrinkles in the upper right of the image suggests that the work is done on paper pasted on canvas. This is also illustrated by the following tread adhesive on the back (if you look closely). Rather, we are dealing with quality oleograph

[redbor]

Worse. They have a dad at a woodcutter's wife to the young, so he took the kids into the woods, not at home so as not to hinder. A confectioner's shop where they found and ate candy .. Brothers Grimm