And yet, one of them a real van Gogh?

[Seriy]

I give my opinion as it draws people.
Call portraits of yellow and brown.
The yellow buttons are, and they were a little crooked pririsoval, especially the top, T e is likely not from nature. And they were added due to the fact that against the author let the green lines. Green buttons of the same color created a game - lines, circles. Also, fill in these buttons in Photoshop and see that the background will come out, it must be something to balance large in the foreground. Balance the buttons.
If the buttons were on the portrait, which was written originally, copyist would certainly have their pririsoval-case quite simple enough.
Same with digitalis. Dark blue foxglove barely visible on a blue background, so was the idea of two-color - pink and blue. Bichromatic naperstyanok not happen. There are gradations of color, but not from pink to blue.
A hand holding up the person on a brown painted a portrait of better quality and realistic. Cap on a brown portrait, too, is better on the yellow, it just does not fly down from the head. Eyes on the brown-realistic in red at this age, they are burnt, they are on the yellow portrait of a dark-blue-red with these do not happen.
Thus, all indications are that the first portrait was painted brown. The author then saw all their shortcomings - his hair does not burn, foxglove merged, background does not give perspective. He has written a new picture, where everything is taken into account. Probably already written to the first portrait.
Coloristic you to receive calls. For the sake of coloristic glare he recorded the red table, so there was no plane in red.

The second portrait was painted early first-bright.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 53 minutes[/color]
tested this theory very easily, should call the Department of Health and to ask in a particular year, in the form of a doctor in an overcoat buttons were out and what color?