And contemporary art is now generally how much it costs?

[Fed]

Сообщение от Fed

What to choose, if you decide to spend their money: on something unknown for 1000 or the well-known for the 300?

    It was a rhetorical question. Of course, that I'll buy a well-known for the 300 and certainly for 1000 only known. Since vain risk their money no sense.
     And even though the price of a maximum of $ 500 for any unknown seems to be voiced, but frankly, with today's large number of proposals merited /people on very low prices that do not see any reason now to buy unknown in general (the more so because they want a double-well-known).

[наследник]

Сообщение от Fed

(the more so because they want twice as known).

It is not they want to ....: shy: (with all due respect to some of the participants in the forum)

[Seriy]

Fed, but you are not counted, SC on one of Hirst's possible to buy honored and popular? Just afraid submit! Ask Mr. Pinchuk, and he his happiness does not know ...

[Fed]

Сообщение от Seriy

Fed, but you are not counted, SC on one of Hirst's possible to buy honored and popular?

     What Hurst unknown? 20 years.
     It is generally bad here an example. Oh he himself get the ball rolling even before the work for real, that others can not dream. Moreover, there is the personality that embody the art or its process. Replacement in verse-Mayakovsky-force in most of their lives. Therefore, pay them and do not say that they are unknown.
     And in general, and, at Hearst to write earlier.

[Seriy]

despite the fact that some buyers, collectors do not need hay at dawn for any money and they believe that more profitable to invest in something else, modern. After all, the unknown, too, bought and so I looked once, October 17 auction of Philips, and there again is full of modern Ukrainians (not Hurst) for decent money, obviously not for the $ 500 means the market is still there and it starts with the other amounts, and there are players and, perhaps, profit.

[наследник]

Сообщение от Seriy

Some buyers, collectors do not need hay at dawn for any money

Do I understand that the "stack ..." is only a figure of speech, but no allusion?

[Fed]

Why so dislike honored and popular? Yes they have and not about hay.
For example, Filipenko AV

[Seriy]

Сообщение от heir

It should be understood that the "stack ..." is only a figure of speech, but no allusion?

a euphemism :-)

[наследник]

Сообщение от Seriy

is a euphemism :-)

Gotcha. Envy your temperance to the letter.

Сообщение от Fed

Why so dislike honored and popular? Yes they have and not about the hay.

  It happens that on the hay cabbage is not enough. That and "sour grapes".

[Seriy]

happens in different ways. My idea is simple-there are some things, and this and that is what markets are different. Price for distinguished defines the market price of the modern-define themselves more accurately, the level of costs, and say, these should be cheaper than those, why do not they cheaper? yes just so happens ... Because sausage is not on 2.40 and not on canvas 25 rubles, and in 1250. Honored and people did not need to cover the entire spectrum of customers and whether their pictures 10 times, still does not cover. And what will happen in 20 years, afraid to imagine. It could happen again American situation - Pollock for $ 140 million - people who see him as an artist grew, zaimeli money and allow themselves to enjoy. So some Ivan rosemaries 20 years headed the top 10. Or, much more likely, Chi Tu Myn.
Here we have discussed here April 13, 2002. Prices for that green grapes from the day rose again to 30-50 times? And a well-deserved?