Tell me, please, the price of modern academic art

[Buscador]

Сообщение от natalia

you ignore my question about Myl'nikova it-how?

Myl'nikov - it is good! And today - all class! In my opinion, it is closer to the Impressionists.

Сообщение от natalia

And here is the scenery workshop as easel stand?

These I like least ...: confused:, but the last

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is what these "public"?

In the gallery, with auctions, etc.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

A gallery, with auctions, etc.

Modern auctions very little, and the price galleries can hardly be called "public".

[natalia]

Сообщение от Buscador

Myl'nikov - it is good! And today - all class! In my opinion, it is closer to the Impressionists.

These I like least ...: confused:, but the last

1. About Myl'nikova heard to his disciples: D and he himself, by the way, I'll tell him when they met
2. But this is academic style in your understanding?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от natalia

Where academism today, if the walls of the Academy it not? In your academism ended in the 19 century? And in that case sechas in Akadmii? If you simply realism, what akakdemiya differs from the others, but there is a difference in skill. And many pixels is "painting the representatives of the Academy"?

All right, what you show instead of academic painting. Because: they are able to competently draw, while drawing with the degree of accuracy (or away from it), which is required when a particular creative vision. Fluent patterns and many painting techniques. Also, subjects, portrait painting and multi-figure compositions. In all the examples, all is well with the figure and composition. Plus, creative ideas and they are different, it confuses those who think academic painting like Losenko, ie local color and shading ... The prices today are different, a year ago of the shops selling artists 1000-1500-2000 dollars for work about a meter. It might be a bit more, depending who he is, his status ...

[natalia]

Oh, I wanted Losenko cite as an example Absolutely agree with you, not ubasit not add paint all really excellent. Thank you

[L-ana64110]

40 000-80 000 rubles in my opinion, taking into account that the gallery natsenit still the same, it all depends otgalerista-ability to sell. Actually, I think any painting with equal success as they can sell for a million and a penny, it is important here, where and to whom to offer and gallop PR.: D

[Buscador]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

all depends otgalerista-ability to sell. Actually, I think any painting with equal success as they can sell for a million and a penny, it is important here, where and to whom to offer and gallop PR.

The problem is not to sell one painting (for a million still harder), and to formulate the market price for the artist. And this requires continuous sales and not "underground", and public ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

And this requires continuous sales and not "underground", and public ...

This is what these "public"?

[Seriy]

natalia, IMHO, this is not an academic school, and the figure of a boy with a bull in general kindergarten.
After all, academic-it is absolutely flawless in technique, color, composition, materials, IMHO.

[natalia]

Сообщение от Seriy

natalia, IMHO, this is not an academic school, and the figure of a boy with a bull generally kindergarten.
After all, academic-it is absolutely flawless in technique, color, composition, materials, IMHO.

Can you give an illustrative example, modern? Because to me it is important to understand what academic school for non-academic circles. It turns out that the Academy is not an academic school. If professors are not an argument, then what?