Tell me, please, the price of modern academic art
 

Tell me, please, I'm at a loss in the assessment. size of approximately 80x60. There were many in the topic about contemporary art, I want to clarify just about academic school, is there a difference?

Вложение 414565Вложение 414585Вложение 414595Вложение 414685

I wonder what you call an academic school? The question should be reduced because of your work ...

40 000-80 000 rubles in my opinion, taking into account that the gallery natsenit still the same, it all depends otgalerista-ability to sell. Actually, I think any painting with equal success as they can sell for a million and a penny, it is important here, where and to whom to offer and gallop PR.: D

  It is the teachers of the Academy of Fine Arts, graduates of the workshop A. Myl'nikova, must be stipulated, I think that is the St. Petersburg school, and that the academic school for you now?

There was a question about academic school - at all. And in the academic school there are certain printsmpy today and yesterday ...
I did not say anything about the work, but merely expressed his opinion that they do not belong, I think, to academic painting

Academism increased by adherence to external forms of classical art. Followers of this style was characterized as a discourse on the ancient art form of the ancient world and the Renaissance. Academism helped the layout of objects in art education, embodies the tradition of classical art, in which the idealized image of nature, compensating for this standard of beauty.
And if there was a view of representatives of the Academy of Art - is another matter:)

There, the phrase "academic artists" it, I think, can be widely understood:) To me, academic painting now is that her writing professor, and that they are positioned as an academic school and expose it to the academic exhibitions, not just anywhere. Academy since changed the face of socialist realism, the training remained the same and the traditional job, but now an independent painting masters Stramit to greater individualism. And if we consider that E. Moiseenko - guru among them, and from painting to expect the same.
Say Hamid Savkuev, S. Repin, Kravtsov - the brightest, the other academic painting in St. Petersburg there:)
Вложение 415755

Вложение 415765

Вложение 415775

natalia, IMHO, this is not an academic school, and the figure of a boy with a bull in general kindergarten.
After all, academic-it is absolutely flawless in technique, color, composition, materials, IMHO.

Can you give an illustrative example, modern? Because to me it is important to understand what academic school for non-academic circles. It turns out that the Academy is not an academic school.:) If professors are not an argument, then what?

I call the academic school and the style associated with academic drawing and natural, (so-called true) the transfer of color and chiaroscuro. If the painting figures with flattened heads and color as a fairy tale, this stylization and modernism, expressionism, etc. ..

Professorship, of course, not an argument (especially today). The argument itself is only a painting. Nobody says that we must preach only a painting, and not another ... It all depends on the artist, his way of thinking, skill and talent. A teacher - can not teach talent. He can (and must) to teach drawing, composition, working with color ... And to open the internal talent of the artist (say, as Oreshnikov). And then, the path for everybody.
And provided you work - different directions realistic of painting (the name you can invent yourself), but not academic ...