"Bulldozer Exhibition" - 35

[ранжер]

Сообщение от Vladimir

So the threat to the system of informal artists certainly were.

Who knew these artists and their work? A group of dissident visitors fashionable salons of Moscow, where nothing had to persuade (rather they doubedyat insufficiently anti-Soviet artist) yes foreigners. Their influence in the vast country with a reinforced concrete ideology was insignificant, or tending to zero. Therefore, power and looked at their work through their fingers, but at the same time using their contacts with foreigners.
What is most feared Soviet power is the simple word intelligibly criticism and means of replication of the word.
All typewriters were registered. Access svetokopirovalnoy technology in enterprises has been limited, people working on it tested, but still under the control of the 1 st Division.
It is very strictly controlled radio and television. Even the direct transfer came on the screens of viewers with a "gap" in 2-3 minutes to take the necessary measures in case of unforeseen circumstances.
Naturally, the authors and advocates for battered seditious words from this government the most.
Even those few artists who in one way or another affected by the repressive state, have suffered not so much for their activities, but because the words flow associated with their names, hostile words of radio voices.

Bar the fact that we are receiving and not receiving from foreign cultural products and personal motive in this case. In those days, a remarkable Soviet cinema wondered why we import so much Labuda, frank kinoshki, while they themselves report the mass of foreign masterpiece, but they do not buy. Commission on procurement mainly consisted of venerable figures of cinema, famous directors. Much later, when able to see these masterpieces, it was clear where his feet are growing in many films venerable and celebrated.