"Bulldozer Exhibition" - 35

[ранжер]

Сообщение от fross

Yes? And I also had a vision

Well, Frosya, You're a smart woman! You all understand. And about the mustard gas, and about Zhenya Rukhin and about Elskuyu, and about many other things, and who, indeed, and for which he was a provocateur, and pro-Soviet party idiots are so stupid frames.
But it was enough for the thing to take advanced and economically motivated gebeshnym guys (later privatizer this country), as they quickly turned it unselfishly, an artistic protest fraternity in a heap vzaimozavistnikov, betraying friends and knocked on the competitors. Look what happened to former friends. Most of them - implacable enemies. Students ungrateful curse teachers, appropriating their merits, teachers do not hesitate to pull out into the light of the dirty underwear of his pupils. Yes, indeed - from hama not do honor. Long time no Soviet Union, but shovels continue to exist.
No need to pile on the myths myths heroize then what was not.

Frankly, for all human beings are very sorry for them, the overwhelming majority by the end of life disappointed. Who deceived himself, who had been deceived, but everything turned out quite differently from how they felt in their perky, rakish, utopian dream.

[Posav]

Oh, about organized scandalousness is to Marat Gelman. Live classic. I've even been born the idea of a parody of this figure of our time ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ranzher

But it was enough for it to take advanced, economically motivated gebeshnym guys

This is where you are so wonderful wonderful dug up?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от fross

so they brought them back to the permanent display, and you tutoshnyh, even free is not taken? Indeed disorder .

Tselee will.: D Actually, I still think for the money. Prestige is not the same.

[fross]

Сообщение от ranzher

Well, Frosya, You're a smart woman! You all understand. And about the mustard gas, and about Zhenya Rukhin and about Elskuyu, and about many other things, and who, indeed, and for which he was a provocateur, and pro-Soviet party idiots are so stupid frames.
But it was enough for the thing to take advanced and economically motivated gebeshnym guys (later privatizer this country), as they quickly turned it unselfishly, an artistic protest fraternity in a heap vzaimozavistnikov, betraying friends and knocked on the competitors. Look what happened to former friends. Most of them - implacable enemies. Students ungrateful curse teachers, appropriating their merits, teachers do not hesitate to pull out into the light of the dirty underwear of his pupils. Yes, indeed - from hama not do honor. Long time no Soviet Union, but shovels continue to exist.
No need to pile on the myths myths heroize then what was not.

Frankly, for all human beings are very sorry for them, the overwhelming majority by the end of life disappointed. Who deceived himself, who had been deceived, but everything turned out quite differently from how they felt in their perky, rakish, utopian dream.

Well, not everything is gloomy, and versions can pile up indefinitely. Everyone is free to believe anything. In this dream, and struggled not find?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

That's why the audience does not.

Speaking of the audience in the Tretyakov Gallery.
About Lavroushinsky not speak, there are crowds, everything is clear.
But turn on the Crimean Saturday (Sunday is not about to say, I do not know) with young children, entire families-a fact which can be observed.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от ranzher

time really, as usual, and have always been wrong, that it is necessary, but without exaggeration and glorification can be dispensed with, not to betray the truth hypothesis, sometimes very much questionable (it's about the mustard in my boots!) .

Boots, shoes, slippers ... mustard, not mustard ... not the point. Maybe with mustard and in fact a metaphor (the episode with Yuri Zharkikh vspomniyut many, I read in the book Alex Rappoport, is here: http://www.expert.ru/printissues/nor... /44no-skylt /) But the fact does not change. Filth did chemical - chemical. The fact that the details are worn over time, and the case was not documented is not important. Precipitate remained.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

By the way, the audience in the Tretyakov Gallery.
About Lavroushinsky not speak, there are crowds, everything is clear.
But turn on the Crimean Saturday (Sunday is not about to say, I do not know) with young children, entire families-a fact which can be observed.

This is the Soviet exposition. There is full and foreigners, especially in "Letters from the front." We have already discussed.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

There is full and foreigners, especially in "Letters from the front." We have already discussed.

I advise you to go and look at yourself, that look of "foreigners" and where a lot of people.
I assure you that foreigners will see in the avant-garde-Malevich, Kliun, Popova, Rozanova, Udaltsova, and our, mainly in painting 20-30-ies. and 60-70's non-conformist just watching, participants Bulldozer exhibition in particular.
In Letters from the front, anyone passing by, glancing briefly ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I suggest you go and look at myself, that look of "foreigners" and where a lot of people.
I assure you that foreigners will see in the avant-garde-Malevich, Kliun, Popova, Rozanova, Udaltsova, and our, mainly in painting 20-30-ies. and 60-70's non-conformist just watching, participants Bulldozer exhibition in particular.
In Letters from the front, anyone passing by, glancing briefly ...

But why go and look at that watch the crowd? Does it have to be a victim of advertising.
I see only what is interesting to me .... with the presence of the crowd, as confirmation of the correctness of choice, absolutely does not matter (even considering that man is social).