Artist Simon Faibisovich

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

the emergence of a large number of technical features to the "artists" just for profanirovaniya creative process.

This is not blasphemy, it works ... "like - not like" - is another question. But this art is the place to be, this new direction in painting ... You do not have anything against Vizheneri art, computer art, narrative, etc. It is a true artist ... without the quotes.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Jasmin

You do not have anything against Vizheneri art, computer art, narrative, etc.

Well, you really compare it with Visionary Simon Faibisovich ...

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, you really compare it with Visionary Simon Faibisovich ...

I can not compare, but rather in opposition, although this is not entirely correct ...: D:

Сообщение от Jasmin

This is a true artist ... without the quotes.

[Posav]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, you really compare it with Visionary Simon Faibisovich ...

Where is the creativity sfotat people at the rally or in the bus and paint?. And Visionary shown on the forum as much time on his hands and painted with stylized and fantasy should work.
As you said again the spirit of contradiction? "If you're against the collective farms, I'm for it." : D

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Jasmin, I was painting Simon Faibisovich know long time.
Yes, compared with the utterly false and invented "art" it is impossible.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Pavel, and photographs of his works you have? You can?

Photos I have not, but it is known in the circles of the Mars Gallery. In the 80s it was very common movement fotorealistov Tammik-Estonians, Latvians, I also touched Somewhere edge. But they have echoed with the world movement in art and was very interesting. Boys very much to appear on the All-Union exhibitions, reproductions were then in flames. Then they went on, but a way to become thieves to use the weak students and those who can not draw. I think Sherstyuk may be on the Internet?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Jasmin

This is not blasphemy, it works ... "like - not like" - another question. But this art is the place to be, is a new direction in painting ... You do not have anything against Vizheneri art, computer art, narrative, etc. It is a true artist ... without the quotes.

Jasmin, you misunderstand me. I do not like everything in the "Visionary Art" and "narrotivnoy figuration" too, and certainly do not like "digital painting". Addressing these topics, I try to explore, to understand these phenomena. (This is what I believe a professional approach). I put "спасибки" I do not always because they like it, sometimes I just thank you for the information of people who shared it with me. I like the forum is because here there are differing views. Familiar with them, you learn something new, and he is encouraged to learn more. World of art as it expands in front of me. I try to approach the art of professional positions. In another way I can. I can not be guided by the principle: you like - not like it. I need to understand why love, why not.
If you noticed, I try to be constructive and do not speak in monosyllables. I have my opinion and I speak for him. Nothing prevents you to do the same. I'm open to other viewpoints, and not cling to his. I have repeatedly changed their attitude to the creation of different artists. (You live and learn.) The only request to opponents, be, please, constructive and sincere (not write that did not felt it). Let's talk about art, because it is behind this, and here we come.

As Faibisovich, the main idea (by which I conclude) here:

Сообщение от Tjutchev

This is strange, when the artist complicates what can be done easily, ie not understand why pictures, then process the image in Photoshop, and then transfer it to the canvas with oil. Does not it easier and more honest it would be to print one image size you want (and do many other artists).

Explain to me please, why the artist do this?

[Posav]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Jasmin, I was painting Simon Faibisovich know long time.
Yes, compared with the utterly false and invented "art" it is impossible.

Art is invented. Not only invented photography.

[Pavel]

Wash pertinent question is not why but how do. This is the second one of the best.
Incidentally another hangs in his office Sobchak. He is much better and I think honest.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

I think Sherstyuk may be on the Internet?

There are, of course.