Mistrust of the Internet

[таша]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

The artist must "vystalyatsya in gallereyah.Delat exhibition personal or edinomyshlennikami.Tolko in communicating with people" live "you can find out their attitude towards this painting.

Well, first, to all artists galleries are not enough. And secondly, who will turn the language to express the artist, looking him in the eyes of an impartial opinion about his work. And, although inspire praise, but criticism helps to move forward. And the Internet allows all hear enough about what you do.: D

Сообщение от Vladimir

Remembering about suspicious loans remembered this post Igor Markin, "okryvshego" schedule Alexandra Yulikova: http://community.livejournal.com/art4ru/127637.html and Nick Internet then a trace was not

I do not think that Yulikov so frankly "licked off" someone else rabotu.Tem more that the Internet did not exist, and the "iron curtain" was. Most likely there was some sort of intersection in the noosphere, sorry for mysticism. This happens for example in science, one discovery made almost simultaneously by different people independently of each other. Someone told me that the paintings of Kandinsky there are signs that are used either Eskimo, or any other shamans, but they were published (in a monograph), only decades after the writing of the paintings. Kandinsky just could not see them anywhere else.

Сообщение от dedulya37

But I do not care.

dedulya37, A is not difficult to explain, why? As an artist loses, except for loss of profits?