Exhibition "Thaw and time after. Moscow Artists 1958-2008"

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Once in the directory "France the second half of XIX - XX century. Collection of paintings." tom2, 2002,
I stumbled on the page 291 on black and white photo artist's paintings Leon-Maxim Fevr (Faivre) "Russian Parisienne" 1891 .. Cite her image does not make sense.

     Description read:
"... The fact that the portrait was commissioned in the late 1880's the salon painter Fevru, shows a certain position in society and prosperity Russian model. Artist before that won a bronze medal at World Expo 1889 in Paris." At that time it was an expensive artist.
    In the same year in Arles hospital, Van Gogh painted a portrait of the doctor free Ray. Who has not been evaluated by Ray and sold for 150 francs Vollaru, which in ten years it preprodal Cassirer, he Dryue. In 1908, SI Shchukin bought it for 4600 francs. Cite its image, too, makes no sense. But a completely different reason - its all they know.
    Expensive custom painting Fevra never leave reservists GMII, unless it is sent to replenish the collection of the provincial museum.

PS

My example says it is wrong to treat the art as the stock market, focusing solely on price tags. If now promotions are growing rapidly, so soon they will fall sharply. Time will judge. Pena leaves. Buyers of "masterpieces" will record a loss.
However, the same can apply to most market shares. It may be advantageous to place the shares "of companies' second-or third-tier? Monsters of the world computer-Hewlett-Packard once started their work in the garage. Now this garage - a museum. But the neighborhood was founded Silicon Valley.