Reflections

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Vladimir

the Administration to act more pitiless. To distinguish the message a candidate for removal is very simple. Criteria: Pursues a message intended to provide participants with additional information about the arts or share their experiences? Not whether the message contains offensive or camouflaged under the controversial remarks about the other participants? That is, not whether the provocative message goals? If the proposed debate, the question of whether the reasoned arguments (protection from flooding)? Appeals and appeals - in the furnace.

Good suggestions but they did 14/08, and banned flooders and provocateurs only today.