Moses Kisling (1891-1953)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

LCR, Arbor is divided into two sections, and all there in those sections of streamlined.
But it is a question to the administration. But it has emerged.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от gans

Still Life is not worse. Here's a bought a of new works Tiholuza.

     Sorry, gans, but I would like to understand the idea that the green pan rests on top? : confused:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

NATA NOVA, so the question of realism.
What is not realism at Kisling. The postwar period look.

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I would like to understand the idea that the green pan rests on top?

On the green is a pan pot, a spoon in the pot ...

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Jasmin

On the green is a pan pot, a spoon in the pot ...

  This is accurate information?

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

This is accurate information?

Checked. Visual method. By examining. Check for yourself.

[gans]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Sorry, gans, but I would like to understand the idea that the green pan rests on top? : confused:

David told me once that there is cabbage and potatoes on the left. Apparently cabbage in a bank or another pot.

[LCR]

Сообщение от gans

David once told me that there is cabbage and potatoes left. Apparently cabbage in a bank or another pot.

Still Life Tiholuza very good, but really what specific vegetables, there are depicted - the case ten

But I want to remind the cyber-population, that the plot is devoted to this theory, Kisling, who also wrote the still lifes good

[gans]

Сообщение от LCR

but I want to remind the cyber-population, that the plot is devoted to this theory, Kisling, who also wrote the still lifes good

Too late! : D: D: D

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от gans

David once told me that there is cabbage and potatoes left. Apparently cabbage in a bank or another pot.

   
I do it too, so he thought. But he wanted to make sure.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 19 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

... let alone what specific vegetables, there are depicted - the case ten

  
    
Let me disagree with you, in the still life is very important recognition of the object. It is a matter of principle. You see, this is a dead nature, she had no other way to defend its right to exist in a work of art. I am talking about recognition, not photographic. The subject must be addressed if it is still life, that is, it must be recognizable. This is an immutable law of the genre. And only then begin to play a role other figurative meanings, depending on the tasks. Still life - first and foremost thing in itself or in the environment. Otherwise it makes no sense to write or draw.