|
|||||||
| Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
| Результаты опроса: Кто, по Вашему мнению, настоящий автор картины «Вид Кремля»? | |||
| И. С. Глазунов |
|
25 | 69.44% |
| другой художник |
|
4 | 11.11% |
| скорее Глазунов, чем другой художник |
|
5 | 13.89% |
| скорее другой художник, чем Глазунов |
|
2 | 5.56% |
| Голосовавшие: 36. Вы ещё не голосовали в этом опросе | |||
![]() |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #61 | |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
|
Цитата:
I also have some experience: eighteen months ago, a collector sent me a photograph of painting portraits, which were given for Roginsky. I replied that no relationship to Roginsky this portrait does not (it was not even a forgery, but simply the work of some unknown author to me. I assume that this was a portrait of Roginsky, although there is no resemblance of a portrait). Then a couple of times this image in electronic form back to me, the last time he sent me a power which was brought to the Tretyakov Gallery for examination, but he refused to attribute his Roginsky. In short, I told everyone about this picture, which, as I understand it, walked all over Moscow. And suddenly it turns out that another collector of my acquaintance became the owner of the ill-fated portrait. I told him: "Why did you bought it, you were told that it was not Roginsky" to which he is justified: "So in fact it was cheap. Me: "So you're saying that you threw to the wind on a lot of money," he - embarrassment mynum eyes ... Well, what are you going to do? According to latest information, he is not trying to return it back to the seller, not the vparit it to someone else I do not know whether you remember, I once wrote that she found on the cyber-auction in the United States falsification, I even ran her picture. Since then I have consulted with his French lawyer, who told me that in general, something we can do very little, because they wrote "is attributed to Roginsky" (although I do not understand how you can "assign" the artist painting on which it stands signature - or is it work or is a fake - and the opinion of gallery owners, certain Havrilyukov "A gallery with thirty years of experience, put it up for auction, it is clear, otherwise they would not appreciate it in 1000-2000 dollars). Either way, he said that the only thing we can do is write to them to understand that I keep abreast of Misha, and stopped his gesheft. So we did, but the feeling of powerlessness, which said Frosinka, I knew well
|
|
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение: | Zenia (05.09.2008) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #62 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2008
Сообщений: 5,017
Спасибо: 5,605
Поблагодарили 6,167 раз(а) в 1,669 сообщениях
Репутация: 9525
|
This is the most important thing and people should understand. The works are monitored and all the less they walk in a circle, and those that are "correct" should be marked with a special label. That is the essence of the dispute between supporters and opponents of the disclosure of all the nuances of determining the authenticity of works of the artist.
|
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо dedulya37 за это полезное сообщение: | LCR (05.09.2008) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #63 | |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Цитата:
The documents (nor, probably, technical labels), confirming the authorship and issued by the authors themselves. Ideal solution. And then do not need to be suspended or "record Krasnopvtseva, no evidence of relatives or heap expertise and opinions. And abandoned Glazunov, too, will not. The author has made the work, gave her documents to remove all doubt. I think that this will come. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #64 |
|
Авторитет
Регистрация: 05.07.2008
Сообщений: 965
Спасибо: 924
Поблагодарили 1,263 раз(а) в 340 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 2028
|
Vladimir,
that's what it means - little experience! (I myself). I recently started, and generally something genuinely believed that all of the major sponsors of living now sold with a certificate of authenticity (well, maybe except for those that are cheaper to manufacture the certificate). At least, we are in our start-up gallery absolutely supply of a certificate that includes a color photo, basic parameters and personal certifies the signature of the author. The second option - the signature gallerist printing company instead of a signature of the author (it has a formal right, as the work of the author bought legally, under the contract, again - with the description in the contract that the work itself). This is a very simple operation. Or I did something misunderstood, and it is about something else. |
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #65 | |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Цитата:
|
|
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение: | iosif (05.09.2008) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #67 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Can not so formal, but something like that. Litsenzruyut also runs a DVD or remember I told you on the certificates of the masters of Dymkovo toy. Technologically, all the issues solved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #68 |
|
Бывалый
|
The certificate is probably good, but how realistic? When the artist must decide for yourself: here from now on I for each certificate are doing their work! When that time comes? When a teenager starts to engage in art school? Or when the artist-fan for the first time picks up a brush?
I understand that in Russia art set at a more professionally leg: academic education, and so on .... But this begs the question, can not in the topic: when, at what point the work of the artist ceases to be a craft and becomes art? Or vice versa .... When art becomes a craft? And what about the artists who did not think about certificates, and draw on their netlenki comer to hand a piece of paper? I understand that this is a big issue, it is not easy, but it may be precisely this question - my personal drive? |
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Zenia за это полезное сообщение: | nikola (17.04.2009) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #69 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,466
Спасибо: 27,924
Поблагодарили 55,361 раз(а) в 24,302 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102421
|
An eccentric Georgian painted signs for dukhans in Tiflis, and so would not recognize anyone, that he is not just a craftsman and an artist of genius, if not other eccentrics who showed his "scribble" the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #70 | |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Цитата:
Go to a museum at Petrovka quickly becomes clear why. In general, life changes, technology foolish to ignore the certificate - this technology. Equally useful as a biometric passport (lived in the same general without passports), or the password on your computer. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Метки |
| art consulting, art dealer, failure |
|
|