Mark Rothko

[Seriy]

The fact that business is business-t e marketing, with a wrap and price manipulation of the psychology of buyers is something news? This is the work of gallery owner and auctioneer, r e the fact that they are obliged to do. But honesty and truthfulness, adequacy of price and promises? ...
Each toothpaste promises us protection against tooth decay, and the dentist will still turn. So? Who is to blame?

What is the difference-SC is Rothko or Picasso, 0.5 million, 5 million or 55 million? Some of us want to buy a few pieces? Then why discuss it?
And Rothko and Bacon-museum artists.
It contains in itself-thread Rothko painting or simply painted on canvas? IMHO-contained. At an exhibition in Moscow back Rothko hang two such copies painted huge canvases, a beautiful course facilitators! Feel the difference, we are told ..
Picasso's genius. Always perfect in color and composition. He has a poor work? complete .. He feared nothing, he has a repetitive-t e in the day wrote on his still lifes with the same garbage-thing there sorted out for themselves ... Units 5 similar still lifes with a brown jug, it is not clear why ... Artistic value of such works, IMHO, is low. Well, so what, he only masterpieces of writing? and when just warm up or to explore, to seek ways? prohibited?
Any author is entitled to garbage. Just some, like Bacon, garbage destroyed, leaving only the history of masterpieces, and some, like Picasso, left, once someone interesting-to your health! But never is not durilovka-t e a focused game with the buyer. If you step by step look at Picasso's work in chronological order, see SC preparatory work done for each work to the same Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. Or how many drawings done by portraits of women, there are sketches of two times compared to the written.