So does the modern artist to be able to draw?

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от spigo

started thinking about this nonsense and decided:

And what nonsense? If the sense of the word - modern, we have clarified what that means - our contemporary, not the one who is engaged in technological processes in the creative field ...

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от spigo

started thinking about this nonsense

The mere posing of the question - nonsense! The artist must be able to paint at all times, and the modern (today), and in the past and in the future ...

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Jasmin

The mere posing of the question - nonsense! The artist must be able to paint at all times, and the modern (today), and in the past and in the future ...

Although, judging by the fact that you like, there is pattern and does not smell ...

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Buscador

Although, judging by the fact that you like, there is pattern and does not smell ...

I like where the smell of art ...

[Posav]

Сообщение от Jasmin

The mere posing of the question - nonsense! The artist must be able to paint at all times, and the modern (today), and in the past, and in the future ...

You are not exact. Imagine that painting is not figurative. In the abstractions need to feel the rhythm of the spots, the rhythm of color, know that such a formal composition. Well you can without drawing directly on the canvas to apply the color stain. There is also a primitive or painting a picture where the child simply revel in the free movement of hands without there knowledge of anatomy. There is also a painting where the first is just an idea, the rest is secondary. And now after age ideas.
But traditionalists, I must say, too zaigryvatsya academic drawing and paste-like bold professional so that the smear technique becomes an end in itself. And what is written or drawn matter. The main thing that a bold stroke or a beautifully superimposed strokes. So stamped lilac, cornflower, head sitters, roofs, trees, clouds, meadows, fields and so on. and TP ..

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Posav

There is also a painting where the first is just an idea, the rest is secondary. And now after age ideas.
But traditionalists, I must say, too zaigryvatsya academic drawing and paste-like bold professional so that the smear technique becomes an end in itself. And what is written or drawn matter. The main thing that a bold stroke or a beautifully superimposed strokes. So stamped lilac, cornflower, head sitters, roofs, trees, clouds, meadows, fields and so on. and TP ..

Your leaves most ideological artists - abstractionists in defiance of the academics-realistam.Gde Well you were to ranshe.Vas and advisers culture Nikita Khrushchov.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Jasmin

I like where the smells of the art ...

Then, perhaps, to sound, what art is, how it smells and it smells like
blundering?

[uriart]

Jasmin, rather the smell of money from the works of art?

[spigo]

Сообщение от Jasmin

The mere posing of the question - nonsense! The artist must be able to paint at all times, and the modern (today), and in the past and in the future ...

Semen Semenovich, would not you obidet.Jasmin answered

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от Buscador

Then, perhaps, to sound, what art is, how it smells and it smells like
blundering?

You've just created a new concept, but may not be new, but only sniff and listen to these sounds are not for the weak mind ...