Art should be explaining?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Vladimir

catching a string of primitive dread of this Makhinov.

Yes, this is so. And still there is something in this doubtful. Mexico? Hearst interested in it? Culture of Mexico collapsed for unknown reasons. Perhaps because of the horror that there is enough. Sacrificed the blood of the victim, this spectacle was not in formalin ... Perhaps people "voted with their feet" to escape from such closely examining "the riddle of death" ...

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

A realistic meanwhile achieved unprecedented - virtually eliminates the barrier between the product and the spectator. This barrier was thinner glass of the tank. The artist has achieved maximum involvement, catching a string of primitive dread of this Makhinov. To the spectator belly felt that before him is not an imitation. With a painting, or sculpture should never have been to create such an effect of animal excitement. It's one thing to look at the film footage from a helicopter, but quite another to actually look down from the observation deck skyscraper. And in fact worked for 100%. Actually such bold actions of artists and include them in the history of art.

About Hearst-realist, I read the first time, and I think this is only the first step, the following should be opus Hearst-primitives. Although most of his dead fish of different sizes suggests Hearst-taxidermist.
And if you lack the excitement of the animal, then the sight of these tours Mahin is immersed in the cells (to understand the possibility of death in the minds of living), well, or at least in the marine aquarium go.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Culture of Mexico collapsed for unknown reasons.

Not to be confused with the cultures of the Maya, Aztecs, Incas?
Mexican culture is alive and well, and Mexico only in 1821, declared independence from Spain and even fought for it for several years.

[Yaya]

fross, I can not agree with you. but why artists write realistic landscapes? because the image they portray, you can see from the window of any car on the suburban highway? I consider them works of art to a much lesser extent. because art is not limited to mimesis. at least the last 150 years

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
K-Maler,

sacrificed the blood of the victim

they offered everywhere, and in Kievan Rus, too

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

is not limited to mimesis.

Let us in Russian, even for "mimesis" is?
Can then say, likeness, reproduction, imitation ... Mimesis! Ha ... : D: D: D
teach you on your head - bald all! (c)

[Allena]

Сообщение от spigo

And can (ethically) starts a conversation about life and death on the basis of such perverted?

Absolutely agree!

[Yaya]

Cyril Syzransky, in my house do not ask virazhatsya! (c)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Yaya, by the way, here in this Greek word we can calculate that you have studied the fundamental aesthetics, from ancient times.
Am I right?

[Yaya]

Cyril Syzransky, I wrote on her diploma

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Am I right?

ja, ja, said Yaya: D: D: D