Young and promising

[Samvel]

Prior to the restructuring of the officials, the poor of our artists up to 50 years and are listed in the category of young artists.
On this I want to fasten on your court Vladimir Kurdyukova.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от LCR

I wonder: why in the 16 th century artists did not write it as in the 15 th, 17 th, not as in the 16 th, 19 th, not as in the 18 th, finally , 20 th, not as a 19-m (talking about Western European art, of course, as in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet), and artists, whose products are shown in this plot, without asking existential questions, repeat " achieve "painting the mid-19 th century, where the quality of determined similarity. Is it not strange?

Interestingly, both written ... Because significant artists did not follow fashion (as you propose), and his feelings. And they are known, not laid himself. The emergence of new trends, of course, enriched the art, but ... to distinguish from today (you can even take most of the twentieth century), the issue was not raised on professinalizme (crafts). It was self razumeischeesya. Today bred clumsy, guised fashionable and incompetent - so I see. This Korovin could say about Vrubel that "he sees not as we are." But he Vrubel itself would not allow such ...

Сообщение от LCR

in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet

You know Russia or bad, or do not like it ... Silver Age! - I hope it to you about something said.

[Konstantin]

I think we are in the heat of the debate away from the theme "Young and promising." In the present study - what is the prospect? These artists according forumchan deserve to make history? Let's even slightly justify why art represents the artist's perspective.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

You know Russia or bad, or do not like it ... Silver Age! - I hope it to you about something said.

Silver Age-end of the 19 th century.
Secular painting (or simply the art in the literal sense) in Russia, of course, was not in the 16 th or 17 th centuries. What has appeared in the domestic 18-m.
About all Quattrocento generally silent (15.)
Only about icons do not need and about the spoon painted, OK?
"Silver Age"! For electricity and phone were ...

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

For the electricity and phone were ...

We have the art ...: D

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

We have the art ...: D

Yes? And that there is "YOU" of art? " It was a secular art in Russia in the 17 th century?
Tell.
You're good, "Russia knows" and "love her" ... : D

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Konstantin

I think we are in the heat of the debate away from the theme "Young and promising."

Just because we have different approaches to the very understanding of art. Some of the fundamental knowledge (skills), plus talent, and someone for the talent in its purest form. But no one has yet written, and how to recognize this talent, if not followed by at least some criteria? A promising young or not, only time will tell.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 14 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

and "love her" ...

Yes, you know, I love her. This land ... I mean. Home not choose!

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Tell.

Well, do not you tell me. You are much more "savvy" me. But if you read my message, you will notice that I did not write any of the 16, or O17, or, even, about 18 centuries ... (although there were goldsmiths, and porcelain, and gunsmith). I wrote only about the "Silver Age", although it can be said of almost all the 19 century

[Konstantin]

But no one has yet written, and how to recognize this talent, if not followed by at least some criteria? A promising young or not, only time will tell.

That is what we are trying to do (and if not us, then who?), Now pay attention to someone. By the way a question for the guru, our all (Levitan, Sovrasovy and further on the list), the age at which attracted the attention?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

I wonder: why in the 16 th century artists did not write it as in the 15 th, 17 th, not as in the 16 th, 19 th, not as in the 18-m, finally, in 20-m not as a 19-m (talking about Western European art, of course, as in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet), and artists, whose products are shown in this plot, without asking existential questions, repeat the "achievements" painting of the mid-19 th century, where the quality of determined similarity. Is not it strange?

And you responded so ...

Сообщение от Buscador

You know Russia or bad, or do not like it ... Silver Age! - I hope that you of something said.

See what and how much contact ...

Сообщение от Buscador

Yes, you know, I love her. This land is ...

But for it to you, and in general all those who tore his shirt on his chest and shouting: "I love Russia!" want to recall the words Dovlatov (not quote) that love-thing intimate and only animals making love on the street. Publicly ... : D

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Buscador

You have much more "savvy" me.

This, apparently, will have to agree ...
(Modestly downcast eyes.): D

[Konstantin]

love-thing intimate and only animals making love on the street. Publicly ...

It's time to calm the passions, the subject did all of the artists, and not about "who and how of forumchan loves Russia."
With respect to both.

PS. When I watch news more often than not love Russia, but when returning from abroad, love, and the crowd and boorishness. As the classic "And the smoke of the fatherland us sweet and pleasant.