A fake Russian avant-garde quantitatively exceeded the original

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And in general all be fakes "on the subject.
Because the fake is not so difficult.

I agree with you. Counterfeits are the first and last. The second and third of the dispute. The third belongs to me. Drove for examination. Judge X thinks it is a fake, an expert Y, believes that there is. Since they work in different expert institutions, it was a chance to get the expertise of at least one of them. But communicated by phone, and left everyone in his opinion, the paper nevertheless decided not to give. Both are similar in the opinion that written work on really old paper that meets the specified period (1920). This torn pages (turnover) from an old book or encyclopedia. Like on ornithology, if not mistaken. And this work has remained so to say "conditionally Boguslavska-Puni". So much for the Russian avant-garde.