This is not Stozharau! - Page 3 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

SergeiSK · 24-06-2009, 08:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-Maler

all the time disappears, my authorization (in writing)

There is nothing terrible, I, too, it happens a lot when you write or think for a long time

Click on "reply" and the site offers a re login. Enter username and password, and your message appears in the subject. It does not disappear.

saymy · 24-06-2009, 13:34

K-Maler, is interesting - at the expense of the work of Victor Aleksandrovich, which can be purchased from him? For one thing, and this, cyclists, we could show.

Евгений · 24-06-2009, 13:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by saymy

For one thing, and this, cyclists, we could show.

And why should it bullshit show?

saymy · 24-06-2009, 16:13

Eugene,
that some wise guy raised once someone's signature on someone else's work, does not remove the fact that work is still there, and that would definitely say "bullshit", you need a reason, or at least see her . Or can you give an opinion on pictures on the Internet? (No offense). Naturally, once determined with the authorship is still possible in such a way, but so categorically - bullshit (relative to what?), Probably not worth it. In relation to V.F.S. - I agree - bullshit. However, it is not done under SA, and stupidly put the signature. Remove it - no one disputes, deal with it. In the end, if this is not the author's re-run - will be n /s so that's somewhat scandalous history.
Although, this is your opinion and it, like any other, has the right to be.

Евгений · 24-06-2009, 19:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by saymy

Or can you give an opinion on pictures on the Internet?

What is the conclusion of this bullshit you want? Stozharov remove the signature and will be just mediocre copy of the picture V.A.Tsvetkova.Stoimost a copy of the 150-200 cu

saymy · 25-06-2009, 09:52

Eugene, and I'm about the same - removes the signature, obtained a copy, on bullshit has long figured out.

dedulya37 · 09-07-2009, 22:05

Here you are. Found only that.

Village. Artist Stozharau.
Painting "Village". oil on canvas, size 85 * 125cm. Artist Stozharau. Artwork not-fitted.

An attempt to do similar. Put here three images.
1.Sobstvenno forgery
2.Kopiya paintings made some Sorokin and therefore do not fall into the category of fakes. Sam Sorokin honestly stated that it is a copy.
3.Original painting, called "Karpogory. Well."

http://www.antiktorg.ru/product/2971

Игорь Гурьев · 09-07-2009, 23:25

I generally strong feeling that Stozharov after 1956 can not be counterfeited.

The fact that you have posted, it is so ridiculous that not even funny.

Glasha · 02-09-2009, 18:59

Today, walking through the Old Arbat, caught eyes for a copy Stozharov, finally saw it about 10 such copies, mostly to its well-known still-life and has already exhausted, as I recall, counterfeiting landscape, with variations in size and signature of the copyist, "David"
However, the turnover did not go if there is information "Copy from ....", could only take pictures on mobile
Alexander, you know about this popular about such miracles?
I think you should visit there and look at the turnover

dedulya37 · 02-09-2009, 19:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glasha

Alexander, you know about this popular, about these miracles?

Thank you, Glasha, now I know. : mad:
You are right to be there is, but that it will? I'm afraid so much tolerance I had nowhere to take and I do David zazvezdyu.
Question forumcanam: that suggest?

09-07-2009, 22:05	Original language: Russian #27
dedulya37 Гуру Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 5,017 Thanks: 5,605 Thanked 6,167 Times in 1,669 Posts Reputation: 9525	Continuing the theme Here you are. Found only that. Village. Artist Stozharau. Painting "Village". oil on canvas, size 85 * 125cm. Artist Stozharau. Artwork not-fitted. An attempt to do similar. Put here three images. 1.Sobstvenno forgery 2.Kopiya paintings made some Sorokin and therefore do not fall into the category of fakes. Sam Sorokin honestly stated that it is a copy. 3.Original painting, called "Karpogory. Well." http://www.antiktorg.ru/product/2971 Attached Thumbnails

02-09-2009, 18:59	Original language: Russian #29
Glasha Гуру Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,976 Thanks: 9,079 Thanked 4,731 Times in 1,133 Posts Reputation: 7675	continued the theme of copies Today, walking through the Old Arbat, caught eyes for a copy Stozharov, finally saw it about 10 such copies, mostly to its well-known still-life and has already exhausted, as I recall, counterfeiting landscape, with variations in size and signature of the copyist, "David" However, the turnover did not go if there is information "Copy from ....", could only take pictures on mobile Alexander, you know about this popular about such miracles? I think you should visit there and look at the turnover Attached Thumbnails

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
VF Stozharau. Here the Russian spirit, here smells	dedulya37	Artists, artworks, art history	157	02-12-2013 14:02
Alexander died Stozharau	Konstantin	Artists, artworks, art history	80	25-08-2012 18:59
Shovkunenko and Stozharau	Leonard2000	Costs, valuation, attribution	3	25-12-2010 16:43
VF Stozharau, help me understand	ShVladimir	Costs, valuation, attribution	17	16-12-2010 00:07

24-06-2009, 13:34	Original language: Russian #22
saymy Новичок Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 5 Thanks: 6 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	K-Maler, is interesting - at the expense of the work of Victor Aleksandrovich, which can be purchased from him? For one thing, and this, cyclists, we could show.

24-06-2009, 16:13	Original language: Russian #24
saymy Новичок Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 5 Thanks: 6 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	Eugene, that some wise guy raised once someone's signature on someone else's work, does not remove the fact that work is still there, and that would definitely say "bullshit", you need a reason, or at least see her . Or can you give an opinion on pictures on the Internet? (No offense). Naturally, once determined with the authorship is still possible in such a way, but so categorically - bullshit (relative to what?), Probably not worth it. In relation to V.F.S. - I agree - bullshit. However, it is not done under SA, and stupidly put the signature. Remove it - no one disputes, deal with it. In the end, if this is not the author's re-run - will be n /s so that's somewhat scandalous history. Although, this is your opinion and it, like any other, has the right to be.

25-06-2009, 09:52	Original language: Russian #26
saymy Новичок Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 5 Thanks: 6 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	Eugene, and I'm about the same - removes the signature, obtained a copy, on bullshit has long figured out.

09-07-2009, 23:25	Original language: Russian #28
Игорь Гурьев Гуру Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: город П. Posts: 4,939 Thanks: 6,544 Thanked 6,620 Times in 2,829 Posts Reputation: 13305	I generally strong feeling that Stozharov after 1956 can not be counterfeited. The fact that you have posted, it is so ridiculous that not even funny.