Sotheby's pre-auction exhibition in Kiev

[Кирилл Сызранский]

vyadem, I remember this moment because of reports from London.

Сообщение от qwerty

I was impressed with the struggle of Ukrainians for a portrait of an unknown to me Cossack Zakharchenko work as an unknown to me the artist Vassilkovsky

But by reports in the painting and even in the history of art is not a "dog" ate.
Also because you have there is almost a genius? So?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 49 seconds[/color]
vyadem, but the genius of an artist is not "opinion"?

[Yaya]

vyadem, no, not yet visited. but it does not mean that I have not seen his work live. its oil can be successful. but it is not listed and will not be listed on the world market. in general, my position seems clear. of the deceased do not want to talk shit. Therefore the development of the topic refrain

[Altim]

Cyril Syzransky, an artist of genius may well be local in terms of sales, fame, etc., that if we talk about the specifics of the domestic art market (CIS, I mean). True, I usually use the word "talented", "outstanding" or something like that, do not say "brilliant" because it is hard to argue.

[Yaya]

Altim, there are no local genius !!!!!!!!! Local genius - an oxymoron!

[vyadem]

Cyril Syzransky, at the expense of this story from London ... all of course know is not possible. But do not know Vassilkovsky ... Then you can not remember Samokisha Tkachenko, Pohitonova, Levchenko, Kostandi etc.
Yaya, one can say ... only history will judge us

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Altim

"talented", "outstanding"

These terms are more suitable.
Malevich genius, Picasso, Modi ...
Here, for example, Vrubel-no longer, in my opinion, and V. Serov.
No?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от vyadem

But do not know Vassilkovsky ...

No, you can ...

[Altim]

Cyril Syzransky, yes, as a language is not rotated. Although Vrubel - perhaps too much he otherworldly places (The Swan Princess remembered, etc.). Or there is my favorite Zinaida Serebryakova - also matter. Extras as good, no doubt, personally I hypnotize her figurativy, but brilliant it? Genius - This is the first single and unique in its kind, probably. Yes, and at the same time - probably have to be "strange" - that is not razvivatel something, and vzlamyvatel.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
Yaya, do not cry, but then I crawled under the table genius can be anything you like, this is a subjective thing. Objectifies it or not - who as luck.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
See. what will happen to the monkeys Chichkan 30 years after his death, let him be God's health. And see what he will sculpt in 60 years.

[Veronic]

Yaya,
This is certainly good that the Ukrainian artists were at Sotheby's, one can say a breakthrough. But all the same too early to draw such far-reaching conclusions. I think that the whole life ahead of them, and will have a lot of work. Complacent it is too early.

[Yaya]

Altim, th .. I did not want
genius is not subjective. this is its essence

[color="# 666686"]Added after 40 seconds[/color]
Veronic, what conclusions? ...

[Altim]

Veronic, Ukrainian artists were already being sold at Sotheby's, in fact. I found the sale, in particular, odessite Gennady Malyshev back in the 90's. Then quiet joy in the fact that it kontemporari broke. But the excitement did not cause. Domestic consumers a hundred years have dreamed it all on Sotheby's to buy, while the external is not very well understand what Ukraine in general, I think. And yet - authenticity in all that, no, well, that's not a country chips that's creative and be forced to remember that in the form of a monkey - it's not the Blue Noses are any, and comrade Chichkan professorial son.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
Yaya, I think it's genius - a set of principles of thinking. It is subjective, a priori, the outside may appear if there are appropriate channels, but can not. This is not public and not an historical assessment, after all.