Fake Goncharov

[artart]

Сообщение от Maroussia

It is interesting turns , but really read French authors and nothing else ? .)

.......................

girl you closely read all the correspondence members of the forum , if you are viewing ....
and about what it was , who asked that and what I answered .



and your advice what to read and what not I do not want -I " read" .
and its position be defined, as already advised .

[khmelev]

Here are pictures Goncharova sold at some time in Europe for quite a little money

[Маруся]

With great pleasure we read the memoirs of Prince Nikita Lobanov-Rostov.
And she found many interesting references about Natalia Goncharova and Mikhail Larionov (in relation to the topic)
For those who have no time to read memoirs - that can credit for an interview from September 2010
http://www.inkapspb.ru/?p=1899

But as the Prince of interest to us describes the period:
.... In those days it was still possible to buy an ink drawing by Rembrandt, it was possible - it cost $ 1,200. It is theoretically possible, because even the two dollars to buy a picture Larionova Larionov, I was not. Goncharova's work is lying on the floor you walk on them. So they had to pick up - take for nothing. The specific issue - the taste was not just shock popular print, color and counterpoint with the same western artists, it was everywhere - 42 artists who worked with Diaghilev, of which 21 - Russian, he was so strong that it left an impression on me for life.

I wonder who else was interested in whether the opinion of Prince Lobanov-Rostov on French publications about Goncharova? Or other recognized Western experts?
(This is the question of the experts)

[uriart]

And it would be nice to ask Nikita Dmitrievich.

It is a contact person.

http://www.russika.ru/lobanov/history.htm

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

But it would be nice to ask Nikita Dmitrievich.

It is a contact person.

Yes, and the forum looks:

Сообщение от qwerty; 121 745

Poaakuratnee, please.
I spoke with Duke, he reads our forum, by the way, thinks that we currently allow a great deal on the west by express themselves in political correctness.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Маруся;3787031@

how fake Larionov relates to the topic "Поддельная Goncharova@"...

I have a suggestion. Not to disassemble conditional 100 questionable work, took the obvious longevity of the work, which was not only Russian, but also foreign negative opinion. Chose the thing with the undisputed evidence is not authentic. Well that is about how Capone was taken for tax, and not all at once. This, of course, only an assumption.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Золотоносов;3787581@

too is a phony, at least, one.

If the book Parton was one, two or three falshaka, then no scandal would have happened. But when 33, but still adjacent to reference things of the Tretyakov gallery, it makes me suspicious. Moreover, the parton is not a neophyte, but a very knowledgeable person.