Contemporary art in museums

[fross]

Klimt simple joy of eyes after viewing Schiele and Kokoschka in Belvedere.

[fross]

Private collections in the NCCA
http://artinvestment.ru/news/exhibit...odern_art.html
Exhibition Boris Turetsky consists of only four works:
1. Watermelon 1968. Gift of family of the artist, 2003
2. Work 1963. Gift of family of the artist, 2003
3. Spatial construction of the circle 1959. Purchased by the means of the Ministry of Culture of Russia, 2001
4. Spatial structure. Thin horizontal stripe. 1950. Purchased by the means of the Ministry of Culture of Russia, 2001

At the risk of once again be caught in the preference for circles and stripes, but I have now an ally in the person of the Ministry of Culture

[iosif]

Сообщение от LCR

Dali - also not a salon. You know, seeing the paintings of Dali, I always think about the charlatans (and Italian, for some reason) who sold some miraculous lapping to restore hair, or the elixir that promotes love joys - to 20-30-ies .. of course, without anhronizmov - or circus jugglers - maybe that Mann has influenced me?

Daly seemed to me very interesting after a visit to Figueres. Even the second time and then drove to walk through the halls.
Yes, of course, he is my colleague - the promoter, and - the upper class. But as an artist and slogger - is impressive.
Actually, my problem is that almost all the artists I like. I can not help himself: eek:

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от iosif

They gave me seemed very interesting after a visit to Figueres.

in Figueres you knocked atmosphere With me too, so it was. Calm, around some fabulous buildings, not a hint of 21, the narrow streets, cozy outdoor cafe. And to the border with France, 10 km. In general, all these nice alien emotions we distribute and the creation of Dali. Castle in Figueres - this is his personal Disneyland. I would except that the schedule once again revised.

[Meister]

Vladimir, you deny that Dali was one of the most important artists of the twentieth century and the undisputed innovator?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Meister

Vladimir, you deny that Dali was one of the most important artists of the twentieth century and the undisputed innovator?

Meister, well, not everything is equal now? This is already a given, common place, the claim is not refuted for years. Artist interesting, no doubt. I hate mostly deliberate fixation on the commercial side, which is not compatible with sincerity in the works. I do not like pop, the calculation of the mass taste. I would call this "optimization" of creativity, when hudozhdnik produces exactly what is in demand. A separate issue - his schedule, it is less commercial and more innovative (on the second floor of the gallery in Figueres, she remembered).

[Meister]

I do not dispute that he painted what in demand, but at the same time, he created a true masterpiece things. But who is really obsessed only on the commercial side of this modern art is nothing new except the desire without the unnecessary mental and physical efforts to create what is garbage and vparit her dearly ... That you're here haite Modigliani, Klimt, Picasso, Dali, too. .. but note now there is no one artist to match them ...

[iosif]

Vladimir,
Money Dali, of course, loved. But I think it is not his main motivation. Catalan's standards, he grew up in a very wealthy family. I changed this life for utluyu fishing hut, where it was easiest to get on the boat. But there could plow from sunrise to sunset. The rich became much, much later.
And anyway, in my opinion, Dali and honestly crazy artist. In all senses.
A schedule is really brilliant, I take pictures there, even a little, good, nobody forbids.
And I liked Pitshot, which I unknowingly for the first time also took over Dali.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от iosif

And the graphics really brilliant, I take pictures there, even a little, good, nobody forbids.

And were these pictures? Displays? I was six years ago, has already erased the memory. I think everyone would be happy to look. And at the same time tell me who this Pitshot.

[Konstantin]

Here you are here haite Modigliani, Klimt, Picasso, Dali, too ... but note, now there is no one artist to match them ...

It does not work is questioned and human qualities.

at least in the phrase Vladimir.

It is difficult not to agree, when correctly so. But in practice? How many spiritual nobility was Picasso? Or Modigliani? Or Dali? All in the New Testament understanding - rare bastards

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

as an example has some well-known art critic, who purchased the painting by Picasso and tried to understand the genius of the artist. Poor taken the time, especially for that on a duty to look at the picture, and the creativity of the artist connoisseur actively disliked, art even cried, looking at a masterpiece.

From my experience I can tell the story.
During the last "Fine Arts" in the Manege. I walked through the halls before the opening, and many (if not all) of the stands were fenced off striped ribbons that did not go. And in the course looked at the pictures. Suddenly, a sharp "hook", and next to another. From far away could not see who the author. Then when everything opened up, I specifically went back to look closer. And what do you think? Picasso!
With the skull if anyone had seen.